Pay in installments of $96.47 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 30 - Aug 4
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Ruby Three Stone Ring with Emerald Cut Diamond Side Stones | TrilogyProduct Description : Ruby Three Stone Ring featuring a stunning emerald cut ruby centre stone, elegantly flanked by emerald cut diamond side stones for a timeless trilogy design. This Ruby Three Stone Ring symbolises love, commitment, and balance, making it a perfect choice for engagements or meaningful occasions. Crafted in a secure prong setting, this Ruby Three Stone Ring is designed to maximise light reflection, allowing both the ruby and
📝 Product Description :
Ruby Three Stone Ring featuring a stunning emerald cut ruby centre stone, elegantly flanked by emerald cut diamond side stones for a timeless trilogy design. This Ruby Three Stone Ring symbolises love, commitment, and balance, making it a perfect choice for engagements or meaningful occasions.
Crafted in a secure prong setting, this Ruby Three Stone Ring is designed to maximise light reflection, allowing both the ruby and diamonds to shine with exceptional brilliance and clarity. The clean lines of the emerald cut stones create a sophisticated and modern aesthetic while maintaining a classic appeal.
Expertly handcrafted and UK hallmarked, this Ruby Three Stone Ring is available in 9K or 18K solid gold (yellow, white, or rose) as well as premium platinum. Choose from natural diamonds (F colour, VS clarity) or lab-grown diamonds (D colour, VVS clarity) for superior sparkle and quality.
Perfect as an engagement ring or luxury statement piece, this Ruby Three Stone Ring combines bold colour with refined elegance for a design that will never go out of style.
✨Key Features :
• Natural Emerald Cut Ruby Centre Stone
• Emerald Cut Diamond Side Stones
• Classic Three-Stone Trilogy Design
• Claw (Prong) Set for Maximum Sparkle
• Total Carat Weight: 0.50ct Option
• Natural or Lab-Grown Diamonds Available
• UK Hallmarked & Handcrafted
• Available in Gold & Platinum
🎁 Ideal for engagements, anniversaries, or special gifting.
📊 Product Specifications :
| Specification | Details |
|---|---|
| Main Stone | Ruby |
| Main Stone Shape | Emerald Cut |
| Total Carat Weight | Approx 0.50ct |
| Side Stones | Emerald Cut Diamonds |
| Diamond Quality | Lab-Grown (D/VVS) or Natural (F/VS) |
| Setting Type | Claw (Prong) Setting |
| Ring Style | Three Stone / Trilogy Ring |
| Metal Options | 9K, 18K Gold (White, Yellow, Rose) & 950 Platinum |
| Manufacture | UK Manufacture |
| Hallmark | UK Hallmarked |
| Delivery | 10–15 Days |
| Return Policy | 30-Day Easy Return |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.1 ★★★★★
Based on 20 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
A fresh historical perspective to the Resurrection! -by Jamie D.
Format: Paperback
Although there have been countless books written about the Resurrection of Jesus Christ from a theological perspective, few have successfully tackled the Resurrection from the historical perspective. Dr. Licona has successfully done just that, applying a historical methodology to the Resurrection of Jesus Christ.
In his opening chapter, Dr. Licona begins by defining what is meant by history, the methods that one employs to study history as well as the limitations that comes when one studies history. It is here that he introduces useful terms to the readers that are re-introduce in subsequent chapter. Horizon, a synonym for bias, can play a critical role in how one perceives and presents history to others. To reduce horizon, Dr. Licona believes that there are six main principles that can help an historian maintain a more objective perspective when reporting history. One of these main principles is that of “historical bedrock” a consensus of what is majorly accepted and infrequently debated. Not only is a consensus important when one considers a hypothesis but a hypothesis that has a solid explanation is important as well. For a hypothesis to have the weight of believability, it must stand up to five different criteria as well.
In chapter 2, Dr. Licona then turns his attention to the subject of miracles and their role in history and successfully debunks the most common presuppositions cited by the world’s most famous skeptics against the historicity of miracles.
It is in chapter 3 that Dr. Licona employs the historical method to the Resurrection of Jesus Christ by examining both biblical and extrabiblical writings spanning within 200 years of the event. Upon the review of these various writings, he assigns a rating from “unlikely, possible-minus, possible, possible-plus, highly probably, indeterminate and not useful” to determine if they contain any historical weight in its regard to the independent testimony of the Resurrection of Jesus Christ.
The historical bedrock principle is re-introduced into chapter 4 and is applied not only to the death of Jesus Christ but to His life as well. Dr. Licona notes that there many aspects of the Jesus’ life and death that are considered historical bedrock even among those with varied agendas.
Dr. Licona concludes his book by examining some of the leading naturalistic hypotheses touted from the most prominent liberal and skeptics in this field. By employing the five criteria that gives the historian the most successful explanation, Licona concludes that it is not the naturalistic hypothesis which fits regarding the Resurrection, but the supernatural one. The supernatural hypothesis of the Resurrection is the most solid explanation since it fulfills both historical bedrock as well as meeting all five criteria for the best explanation and thus should be considered by any credible historian as a well attested event that occurred in the past.
In summary, I highly recommend this book. As a believer of 40+ years, I learned things about my faith that I did not know about before. For example, I learned how the kerygma, an early Christian creed, lends historical weight to the Resurrection. My advice for believers is not to be intimidated by the voluminous size of this book. It was certainly well worth the read. Dr. Licona has done an excellent job in presenting the material through the perspective of a historian, so much so that one may temporarily forget that he is a theologian as well! Despite the myriad of footnotes peppered through the pages, the book was very easy to read and digest. In short, a must read for those who want to have a better understanding in how to engage skeptics from a different perspective when discussing the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. Get it! You’ll feel that much smarter and grounded in the faith once you’ve read the last page!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 5, 2021
★★★★★ 5
Don’t be intimidated...it's detailed, but systematic and rational
Format: Paperback
Don’t be intimidated by this 700-page tome. Once you factor in the bibliography, index and footnotes, the body of the work is only about 400 pages. Licona includes an all-important, detailed outline for quick reference back to key topics, and it’s valuable because of the variety of issues he tackles. I’d say, he does a wonderful job of giving us an objective, systematic approach to addressing the historicity of the events following Jesus’ crucifixion.
Licona lays the groundwork for his examination of the issue by considering the philosophy of history and tackling things like what is truth, what makes something a historical fact, who has the burden of proof, and is history a science? As a needed addition to this philosophical introduction, he spends time outlining the methods he will use to approaching relevant texts, claims of miracles, and consensus facts. Most important, I think, to his methods was his self-examination of potential bias due to personal belief and worldview. He addresses what he calls a personal “horizon” that historians must be set aside in order to be objective and get at the truth. He certainly points it out in others along the way and makes it clear throughout the book that he is trying to identify and eliminate any potential bias he may bring to the process.
In his investigation, he addresses the most important sources related to Jesus’ life, crucifixion and claims of the resurrection. He deals with both Christian and non-Christian sources that were written immediately following the events as well as within the following 200 years. Licona makes the case for authenticity and credibility of the most important sources, and where there have been challenges to these sources over the centuries, he addresses those challenges head on. Ultimately, he boils the events, claims, facts and sources down to what he calls the “bedrock” pertaining to the fate of Jesus. This bedrock consists of three facts that are well supported by authentic, textual evidence which enjoy nearly consensus support by all historians (both Christian and non-Christian). For Licona, the bedrock which need be answered are (1) Jesus’ death by crucifixion, (2) the claims Jesus appeared to individuals and groups following his burial, and (3) the conversion of the Church persecutor, Paul.
Ultimately, Licona breaks down six different hypotheses which claim to explain the bedrock and he uses systematic criteria for weighing those hypotheses. He concludes that a resurrection is the best explanation but admits that it’s only by setting aside a naturalistic worldview that one can embrace the conclusion.
I like Licona’s methodical approach but would offer two critiques. Do we really need all the Greek citations written out? I understand that there is nuance and variations in meaning for words that are used in the original sources, but to give us all the text and the translation seemed superfluous. Second, I think it was a cop-out to skim the importance of the empty tomb. Other historians put the fact of the empty tomb as one of their top facts to be explained, but Licona punted on it because he didn’t feel it received universal consensus. Consensus aside, the fact of the empty tomb does receive support by a strong majority of scholars, even ones that do not support the resurrection. This cross-section of scholarly support, along with the volume and type of textural evidence, namely the confirmation by Christian enemies, should have elevated the fact of the empty tomb to the “bedrock” which require explanation.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 12, 2021
★★★★★ 5
so helpful
Format: Paperback
got for school and used it a lot its been so helpful
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 3, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Great price...
Format: Paperback
Needed this for my EKG course. Price was right.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 1, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Satisfied
Format: Paperback, Format: Paperback
Brand new got here on time, haven’t got to indulge in the content yet but definitely exactly what I ordered.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 10, 2025
recommand products
Nappi Large L-Sectional w/ Ottoman (Compressed Foam)
798.95
Rilva Counter Ht. Stool (1/CTN)
157.70
Clara Beau scallop edge Silver bracelet with swarovski crystal Bf190
52.00
UFRIDAY Clear Shower Curtain Liner 72 x 75 inch, PEVA Bath Curtain for Home and Hotel, Extra Long with 5 Magnets Bottom
25.49
ST Suspension X Coilover System - E39 5-Series Touring (w/o Air Susp.)
636.00