SKU: 3293361649

BURNET, Gilbert. Bishop Burnet's History Of His Own Time. Vol. I. From the Restoration of King Charles II to the Settlement of King William and Queen Mary at the Revolution: To Which is prefixed a summary Recapitulation of Affairs in Church and State fro…

Sale price$270.00 Regular price$300.00
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $75.00 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 23 - Aug 28

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

BURNET, Gilbert. Bishop Burnet's History Of His Own Time. Vol. I. From the Restoration of King Charles II to the Settlement of King William and Queen Mary at the Revolution: To Which is prefixed a summary Recapitulation of Affairs in Church and State fro…BURNET, Gilbert. Bishop Burnet's History Of His Own Time. Vol. I. From the Restoration of King Charles II to the Settlement of King William and Queen Mary at the Revolution: To Which is prefixed a summary Recapitulation of Affairs in Church and State from King James I. to the Restoration in the year 1660 [volume II:] Vol. II. From the Revolution to the Conclusion of the Treaty of Peace at Utrecht, in the Reign of Queen Anne. To which is added, the

BURNET, Gilbert. Bishop Burnet's History Of His Own Time. Vol. I. From the Restoration of King Charles II to the Settlement of King William and Queen Mary at the Revolution: To Which is prefixed a summary Recapitulation of Affairs in Church and State from King James I. to the Restoration in the year 1660 [volume II:] Vol. II. From the Revolution to the Conclusion of the Treaty of Peace at Utrecht, in the Reign of Queen Anne. To which is added, the Author's life, by the Editor. London: Printed for Thomas Ward in the Inner-Temple Lane [volume II:] Printed for the editor, by Joseph Downing in Bartholomew-Close, and Henry Woodfall in the Strand. 1724-1734.

Two volumes, folio. Contemporary worn and partly restored full calf, spines with raised bands and contrasting lettering-pieces; pp. [xvi], 836; [xxii], 360, 357-765; title pages with woodcut vignettes, woodcut head- and tail-pieces; occasional spotting, the final six leaves of volume one with foxing to upper margins and small flaws, the final 55 pages of volume two with ink spots to outer margins; otherwise clean internally.

First edition, edited and published posthumously by the author's sons, one of the most important historical narratives of the period. Burnet (1643-1715) was Bishop of Salisbury, and had been at the centre of some events of the Restoration, gained the favour of King Charles II, advised him during the Popish plot of 1678, a fictitious conspiracy. Upon the succession of the Roman Catholic King James II in 1685, Burnet went into exile on the Continent, and became a confidant of both William and Mary. When William's fleet set sail for England in October 1688, Burnet was made the future King's chaplain. Gilbert Burnet, frequently involved in high politics and sometimes in exile, was perfectly placed to write a history of the turbulent times in Britain after the Commonwealth. His work has the authority of an eyewitness, whilst aiming at impartiality.

Provenance: At the end of volume two contemporary manuscript entry on title-page verso: "The original manuscript of both volumes of this history will be deposited in the Cotton Library by T. Burnett", as sometimes the case; both volumes with ownership inscriptions by Heaton Wilkes, dated 1759 to front fly-leaf, volume two with ownership inscription of George Tate, dated 1836 and the note "Born Jan - 11- 1805" underneath, this repeated upside-down at the end of the same volume. Heaton Wilkes (1727-1803) was the son of a Clerkenwell distiller, who ruined his father's business in 1779. His older brother John was the famous 18th-century radical and writer. George Tate (1805-1871) was a Northumberland topographer, antiquarian and naturalist.

ESTC T144688.

SKU: 2124480

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 3293361649

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 11 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
M
Verified Purchase
Moon Riley
Louisville, US
★★★★★ 5
Sugar free
Tastes great
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 21, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Mr. Paul A. Ackermann
Los Angeles, US
★★★★★ 5
Dude, it's not just a horror novel
Format: Paperback
This is to the previous reviewer (C. Scanlan). If this is just a horror novel, it failed miserably. It is not exactly a blood ’n gore thriller. Compared to Stephen King, it is pretty tame. What puts the horror in this book is that it is social commentary. Mary Shelly is not just trying to scare us. It is more than just a “Friday the 13th” movie. Mary Shelly is delivering a message. It seems that everyone understands this except this reviewer. There have been several different interpretations of the novel (see [...] for 10 different meanings of the novel). ICE takes the interpretation that Shelly is saying science can go too far. This is a perfectly valid interpretation. One can disagree with this interpretation but let’s not resort to name calling and personal attacks – that those who hold such an interpretation are doing a “low level attempt to cash in on home schooling Christian paranoia and fear of health care” or believe that “AIDS [is] the fruit of sin”. My wife and I are Catholic parents and we sent our children to public schools He mocks the idea of a secular fundamentalist but then demonstrates what that is. A religious fundamentalist sees anyone who disagrees with him as being of the devil. A secular fundamentalist sees anyone who disagrees with him as guilty of “brainwashing” others. In both cases, true dialogue is impossible. Another thing that a fundamentalist does is that he sees things in opposite extremes. If you are warning of the dangers of trusting too much in science then you must be against science. There is no middle ground for the fundamentalist. If you see that science can sometimes go too far then that means you are against health care. But this is a non-sequitur. Nielson writes “Frankenstein’s placing of the creation of life within the scientific method first destroys the unrepeatability and systematically eliminates the other elements [of hope, love, beauty, creativity and sacrifice]”. Nielson is not criticizing the scientific method in total. He is only criticizing it in the creation of life. The reviewer writes “He thereby easily and explicitly condemns the whole process and philosophy of the scientific method”. But Nielson is not condemning the whole process of the scientific method. He is only condemning it in the creation of life. The reviewer then mocks the credentials of the critics in the book - “So who are these essayists superior to Norton's and Oxfords and free of deconstructionist feminist secular fundamentalism, experts so august Ignatius should want them mentioned on their product page yet are nowhere to be seen?” But this game can be played both ways. What are the credentials of this reviewer? Is this reviewer so august as to challenge these essayists? Again, this is merely an ad-hominem attack. I really do not care who has the best credentials. What matters is who makes sense. Sometimes intellectuals can make the dumbest claims. Read Paul Johnson’s book, “Intellectuals” (http://www.amazon.com/Intellectuals-Marx-Tolstoy-Sartre-Chomsky/dp/0061253170/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1421862888&sr=8-1&keywords=intellectuals). He compares the essayists unfavorably to “good solid Roman Catholic moral theology” from the likes of Richard A. McCormick S.J., who “is the renowned leader of Roman Catholic Moral Theology in the field of bioethics in the USA.” He overlooks the fact that A. McCormick S.J. has dissented from teachings of the Popes Paul VI, John Paul II, and Benedict XVI over contraception. The “renowned leader” in the Catholic Church in morality is first and foremost the pope. Since Richard A. McCormick has contradicted the popes, he cannot be a good solid Catholic theologian. Mary Shelly lived right after the Enlightenment – man is the measure of all things. She lived at a time when people believed that science will solve all our problems. This is called scientism. ICE contends that Shelly is saying that we may be expecting too much from science. It does not mean that Shelly was saying that we should reject science. And it does not mean that Shelly believes that we should go back to the Catholic faith. In fact, ICE acknowledges that Shelly was an anti-Catholic. But the Church believes that the kernel of truth can be found in others, even in anti-Catholics. This is part of the Catholic tradition. St Augustine learned from Plato and St Aquinas learned from Aristotle. ICE would take that kernel of truth and expound that with the fullness of the Catholic faith. You may disagree with the Catholic faith, or with ICE looking at Shelly’s book from a Catholic perspective. But this is at least as a legitimate an interpretation as any other. In fact, this interpretation seems closer to the truth than the others. This interpretation is the traditional interpretation, which means that it goes back further to Shelly’s time than the modern interpretations, and is therefore less likely to be in error. BTW, the reviewer wrote that “Opus Dei right wing publishing (or reprint) house is selling this novel is to milk the home school market and to support its own bizarre bio-ethical ideology”. This is factually wrong. The company that publishes Opus Dei’s books is Sceptre. But the publisher of ICE is Ignatius Press.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 22, 2015
R
Verified Purchase
RC Mom
Houston, US
★★★★★ 5
Good experience
Format: Paperback
It was all good.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 24, 2025
B
Verified Purchase
Brian J. Buckley
Chelsea, US
★★★★★ 4
Love the Edition and Footnotes; Don't need the Cultural Criticisms
Format: Paperback
The layout of the book and the footnotes are each great. What mars the book, unfortunately, is the editor's need to make simplistic statements about cultural elements. Several times, for example, he addresses "feminism," even using the term "Franken-feminists" in a puerile manner at one point. As too many of these conservative Catholics do, he simplifies and comments about modern culture without nuance. In this case, it is simply unprofessional and inaccurate (i) to not capture the myriad differences in feminist thought (many of which he and his readers would accept) and (ii) thereby to make all feminists the same (e.g,, assuming the feminists of the 1970's are the same as today's.) This is all unfortunate because when he is just addressing the literary elements of the book, his comments are wonderful and helpful to the reader. Any reader should know that this presentation will be tilted in an unsophisticated and simplistic way toward a traditional Catholic view (a view that can indeed be defended well while still being careful and charitable to critics). With that caveat, he (or she) should still buy it and garner a good edition of the text.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 12, 2024
A
Verified Purchase
ABH
Port Orchard, US
★★★★★ 5
Great edition
Format: Paperback
Love Ignatius critical editions. There are so many scholarly essays that are so vague and uninteresting, or worse, try to de-construct the writer's work. Ignatius critical editions' essays are wonderful and do not miss the timeless point of the great literature the series brings forth.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 10, 2016

recommand products