Pay in installments of $3.00 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 29 - Sep 3
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Acrylic Color Powder #02De Beauty Label Acrylic Color Powder #02 is een witte kleur met een subtiele shimmer die intens gepigmenteerd is en geeft een zeer goede dekking. De Beauty Label Acrylic Powders zijn de sleutel tot het creren van prachtige en duurzame acrylnagels. Met een breed scala aan kleuren en texturen bieden deze hoogwaardige poeders eindeloze mogelijkheden voor nagelstylisten en liefhebbers van acrylontwerpen. Dit product wordt uitgehard in combinatie met de
De Beauty Label Acrylic Color Powder #02 is een witte kleur met een subtiele shimmer die intens gepigmenteerd is en geeft een zeer goede dekking.De Beauty Label Acrylic Powders zijn de sleutel tot het creëren van prachtige en duurzame acrylnagels. Met een breed scala aan kleuren en texturen bieden deze hoogwaardige poeders eindeloze mogelijkheden voor nagelstylisten en liefhebbers van acrylontwerpen. Dit product wordt uitgehard in combinatie met de Beauty Label monomer!
LET OP! Beauty Label heeft 4 soorten Acrylic Powders:
- Acrylic Powder Fast Extreme. Deze is snel drogend.
- Acrylic Powder Cover. Deze is medium drogend
- Acrylic Powder Slow Extreme. Deze is langzaam drogend.
- Acrylic Color Powder. Deze is langzaam drogend en geschikt voor nail art.
Kenmerken en voordelen:
- Hoogwaardige kwaliteit: Beauty Label Acrylic Powders zijn gemaakt van premium ingrediënten die zorgen voor een optimale hechting en duurzaamheid van uw acrylnagels. Ze zijn gemakkelijk te mengen, waardoor u volledige controle heeft over het gewenste resultaat.
- Breed kleurenpalet: We bieden een breed scala aan kleuren, van klassieke nude tinten tot levendige, trendy kleuren. Of u nu op zoek bent naar een natuurlijke look, een subtiele French manicure of opvallende nail art, Beauty Label Acrylic Powders hebben de perfecte kleur voor elke stijl en gelegenheid.
- Uitstekende dekking: Onze poeders bieden een uitstekende dekking, waardoor u gelijkmatige en vlekkeloze acrylnagels kunt creëren. Ze hebben een goede pigmentatie, zodat u met een minimale hoeveelheid poeder een maximale kleurintensiteit kunt bereiken.
- Eenvoudige verwerking: De Acrylic Powders hebben een ideale consistentie die zorgt voor een soepele applicatie en een gemakkelijke verspreiding over de nagel. Ze mengen zich goed met onze Acrylic Monomer en laten zich gemakkelijk vormen en modelleren.
- Duurzame resultaten: Onze Acrylic Powders bieden langdurige resultaten met een uitstekende duurzaamheid. Ze zijn bestand tegen chippen, krassen en vervagen, waardoor uw acrylnagels er langdurig mooi en verzorgd uitzien.
- Veelzijdigheid: Onze Acrylic Powders zijn niet alleen geschikt voor het creëren van volledige acrylnagels, maar ook voor het maken van nail art, 3D-designs en andere creatieve toepassingen. Laat uw verbeelding de vrije loop en maak unieke nagelcreaties die de aandacht trekken.
Breng uw acrylnagelontwerpen naar een hoger niveau met onze hoogwaardige Acrylic Powders. Of u nu een professionele nagelstylist bent of gewoon van het creëren van prachtige nagels houdt, deze poeders bieden u de mogelijkheid om unieke en professionele resultaten te behalen.
Let op: Voor de beste resultaten raden we aan om de Acrylic Powders te combineren met onze Acrylic Monomer. volg de bijgeleverde instructies zorgvuldig en oefen de juiste technieken uit. Als u niet bekend bent met nagelapplicaties, raadpleeg dan een professionele nagelstylist voor begeleiding of volg een professionele cursus. Werk volgens de juiste technieken en veiligheidsrichtlijnen.
Voeg onze Acrylic Powders toe aan uw collectie en laat uw creativiteit schitteren met adembenemende acrylnagels!
Te gebruiken met:
- Top Coat
- Monomer
- Gels (builders, BIAB, Rubberbase, etc)
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.3 ★★★★★
Based on 7 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 3
Only holds towels in place when it is full or 1/2 full
Color: 01-silver
If you are buying this for the feature of holding the paper towels in place so you can just rip one, I think you will be disappointed. Once the roll becomes smaller (and I tried changing the arm) the arm does not touch the towels. I do like the firm grip on the counter. My other dissatisfaction is the base gets water spots. Being near the sink this happens frequently. It does its job and is attractive.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 21, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Stylish
Color: 01-silver
Good sturdy stand for paper towels. Has small suction cups on bottom for stability. Good finish and good fit under the counter. Heavy base and not flimsy feeling. Brushed aluminum matched other appliances well.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 6, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Goodbye for the value
Color: 02-black
Great value looks wonderful very adorable
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 31, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Required Reading for Egyptologists
Format: Paperback
To say the very least, this book is an enlightening read. The author attempts to design a new chronology of Egypt based on a number of archaeological observations he made which pointed to certain anomolies in the standard chronology of the Third Intermediate Period of Egyptian history. The TIP is one of those points in history where information is scanty and there is much room for error in interpreting existing archaeological evidence. Rohl posits that the 21st and 22nd pharaonic dynasties were at least partly contemprary in a period of balkanization of Egypt, contrary to the conventional chronology's view that they were successive. He therefore shifts the entire preceding dynastic histories downward from 200 to 300 years. That is, what we previously though to occur at 1250 BC actually happened at 1000 BC according to Rohl. In so doing Rohl has done much to synchronize Egyptian chronology with the chronology of the bible.
Rohl claims that the Amarna letters were not to be compared to Joshua's conquest of Canaan, a period where they clearly do not fit, but rather tell the tale of Saul's and David's claiming of Israel from Phillistine Egyptian vassals. He synchonizes Ramesses II's conquests of Asia Minor with the biblical invasion of Shishak. Also, he identifies the Egyptian 'Hyksos' with the Amalekites of the book of Exodus. There are many other enlightening points of connection with the bible that Rohl makes, but my point here is not to explain them all.
The true value of this book for any egyptologist, student of biblical history, or any student of the ancient world at all, is this book's popular presentation of the field of archaeology and ancient history. So rare are books that actually connect a lay reader with the methodologies and evidence upon which researchers base their works. In order to show a need for a revision of Egyptian chronology, Rohl shows how the entirety of Egyptian chronology depends on all but of a handful of archaeological finds, many of them of dubious reliability. Even if Rohl's opponents find more pieces of evidence supporting the standard chronology, the number will still be very small and they will quite likely be as subject to interpretation, as are the ones that Rohl has pointed out. Rohl goes to great lengths to show the history of the observations that scholarship has made, thereby showing us where they may have gone wrong. (As a popular book, I must confess that parts of Rohl's historical narratives depict events in which one expects to find Indiana Jones) Next, when building his own chronology, Rohl puts us close to the texts and archaeological evidence upon which he bases his theories. Rohl's conclusions are in many cases impressive, but in some cases I had to shake my head and come to the conclusion that he was grasping at straws. For instance, I believe that his work in astronomical retrocalulations to find the dates of eclipses recorded in ancient texts is pretty shaky. I even doubt that the text that he is talking about is even mentioning an eclipse. This information has proved to be incredibly valuable to me, however, as I now know that astronomy based chronology, something I though would give absolute and undisputable dates, is as foggy an area of research as any.
I do not know if I will eventually embrace Rohl's ideas or not, or if partially. I do know that reading this book has shown me the types of reasoning and observations that old world historians make, and can now make an informed decision about how firm our grip on dating events of the past is. My conclusion: if somebody tells you some biblical event did not happen because the dates don't line up with scientific knowledge, don't be disheartened. We have a LONG way to go before we can truly be confident about such statements, if indeed we will ever arrive at that sort of knowledge. This uncertainty that I have gained from Rohl's book is corroberated by the "Oxford History of Ancient Egypt" which provides wonderful information on Egyptian chronology.
Everyone who wants to study ancient history, whether it be Egyptian, biblical, Middle Eastern, or even Chinese for that matter, should read this book, so the next time they read somewhere that 'such and such happened at 3200 BC', they will know to take that statement with a grain of salt. Whether Rohl is right or not, I am forever indebted to him for showing me how chronologists operate.
Lastly, I would like to say, after all this talk about archaeology and methodology of Egyptologists, that this book is very readable and comprehensible to the lay reader. Though a smattering of knowledge of biblical and/or Egyptian history will make the book more interesting to the reader, no such knowledge is required in order to understand the book or find value in it. It is truly a popular book intended for the average interested person. I recommend it to all.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 10, 2001
★★★★★ 5
Exciting reinterpretation of ancient history.
Format: Paperback
In "Pharoahs And Kings", author David Rohl offers the reader a stunning new interpretation of the events of the ancient world in Egypt and the Levant. In doing so, he ties in Biblical events to their proper place in history. This is a stunning reordering of events and personalities and brings both Egyptian and Biblical history to a much closer synchronization.
The book begins in Egypt where Rohl lays out his evidence for condensing the chronology of Egypt. Though we use AD/BC as a method of numbering our years, the ancients did not do so and used regnal dates ("In the third year of Pharoah So-And-So's reign, something happened."). By counting all Pharoahs and their reign lengths, historians felt they had a handle on when, according to our dating system, things happened. When they did so, they discovered the events portrayed in the Bible didn't match. When they date Solomon's reign in Israel to the Iron Age, for example, they find economic development to be poor - a far cry from the Biblical accounts of Solomon's reign as a flowering of culture and rich in trade. Likewise, Jericho's walls did not fall in the time period most historians would place the Exodus and entrance into the Levant of the Hebrews. Therefore, the Biblical accounts are simply myth, nothing more.
David Rohl is a historian, not a religious believer and his point of view is as a historian. His focus is to find a more accurate timeline for the events in the ancient Middle East. He begins in Egypt because that is his area of expertise and he gives convincing arguements for re-ordering the events of Egypt. The clincher, for me, was the tombs of Tanis (among other inconsistencies in the conventional dating such as the number of Apis Bulls) in which the tomb of Psusennes I cuts into the tomb of King Oskoron II and was obviously built after the tomb of Oskoron II. The problem? Oskoron II was from the 22nd dynasty while Psusennes was from the 21st! It is quite obviously reversed! Rohl's conclusion is that two dynasties were contemporary and that about 140 years needs to be removed from the timeline of Egypt.
When this is done, events in the Levant match the events in the Old Testament very closely. In the New Chronology, Jericho falls just when the Hebrews are entering Canaan according to the Bible. Solomon's Israel is now placed in the Late Bronze Age where there is evidence of prosperous cities and flourishing trade. There is evidence of mentions of both Saul and David in the Amarna Letters.
This was a page turner and Rohl's work, although controversial, is backed up by fact and evidence. There is less evidence for some of his conclusions than others (in my mind), but it is well researched and never strays from a scholarly interpretation of the evidence written and on the ground.
I actually enjoyed this book! David Rohl writes in a very engaging fashion, often using humor. His writing skill keeps subjects that may seem dull very frsh and exciting. He often uses humor and engages the reader, challenges the reader and forces the reader to think. This is not the usual dry tome on archeology that puts you to sleep! He assists the reader with many and high quality photos and drawings of the evidence and includes "side bars" with definitions and explanations in the margins to help the layman navigate the technical aspects of history and archeology without getting bogged down and overwhelmed.
This is a fine book and more than deserving of five stars. It's a very eye-opening and interesting read that doesn't seem like a college textbook. Instead, he challenges the reader while entertaining at the same time. I recommend this book with five stars!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 29, 2012