SKU: 71625856555

Portret van een vrouw

Sale price$91.35 Regular price$101.50
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $25.38 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 17 - Jul 22

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Portret van een vrouwHet "Portret van een vrouw" van Judith Leyster is een prachtig voorbeeld van de levendige en realistische portretkunst uit de Nederlandse Gouden Eeuw. Dit schilderij toont een vrouw, gekleed in eenvoudige maar elegante kleding, met een vriendelijke en open blik die haar innerlijke warmte en karakter weerspiegelt. Leyster, een van de weinige vrouwelijke schilders uit die tijd, staat bekend om haar vermogen om haar modellen op een levendige en directe

Het "Portret van een vrouw" van Judith Leyster is een prachtig voorbeeld van de levendige en realistische portretkunst uit de Nederlandse Gouden Eeuw. Dit schilderij toont een vrouw, gekleed in eenvoudige maar elegante kleding, met een vriendelijke en open blik die haar innerlijke warmte en karakter weerspiegelt. Leyster, een van de weinige vrouwelijke schilders uit die tijd, staat bekend om haar vermogen om haar modellen op een levendige en directe manier vast te leggen. Dit oude meester schilderij straalt een gevoel van spontaniteit en menselijkheid uit dat kenmerkend is voor Leyster's werk.

Wie was oude meester Judith Leyster (1609-1660)?

Judith Leyster was een vooraanstaande Nederlandse schilder uit de Gouden Eeuw en een van de weinige vrouwen die succesvol was in de door mannen gedomineerde kunstwereld van die tijd. Geboren in Haarlem, werd ze opgeleid door Frans Hals, wat duidelijk terug te zien is in haar levendige en expressieve stijl. Leyster specialiseerde zich in portretten en genrestukken, en haar werk werd zeer gewaardeerd om zijn technische vaardigheid en de levendigheid van haar figuren. Haar schilderijen, zoals het "Portret van een vrouw", worden geprezen om hun directheid en de subtiele weergave van karakter.

Kenmerken van de Barokke portretstijl en de expressieve stijl van Judith Leyster

De Barokke portretstijl, zoals toegepast door Judith Leyster, combineert realisme met een levendige en directe weergave van haar modellen. Leyster maakte gebruik van losse, expressieve penseelstreken en een subtiel gebruik van licht en schaduw om de gelaatstrekken en emoties van haar modellen op een realistische en levendige manier vast te leggen. In het "Portret van een vrouw" komt Leyster's vaardigheid in het creëren van een intieme en menselijk portret duidelijk naar voren. Haar schilderijen onderscheiden zich door hun gevoel van spontaniteit en de natuurlijke houding van de geportretteerden, wat hen een tijdloze aantrekkingskracht geeft.

Geschiedenis achter het oude meester schilderij: Portret van een vrouw

Het "Portret van een vrouw" werd geschilderd rond 1635, een periode waarin Judith Leyster volop in haar artistieke ontwikkeling was. De identiteit van de vrouw in het portret is onbekend, maar haar eenvoudige maar elegante kleding en haar vriendelijke uitdrukking suggereren dat ze een welgestelde burger was. Leyster's meesterlijke techniek komt tot uiting in de levendige weergave van haar gezicht en de subtiele details van haar kleding, waardoor het portret een gevoel van tijdloze menselijkheid en warmte uitstraalt. Dit werk is een prachtig voorbeeld van Leyster's talent om de persoonlijkheid en het karakter van haar modellen op een directe en natuurlijke manier vast te leggen.

Museumkwaliteit Muurmeesters voor de Leyster meesterwerken

Oude meester schilderijen voor jouw muur

Het "Portret van een vrouw" van Judith Leyster voegt een gevoel van warmte en menselijkheid toe aan je interieur. Onze museumkwaliteit reproducties van dit oude meester schilderij zijn perfect voor diegenen die de levendige en expressieve schoonheid van de Nederlandse portretkunst willen ervaren. De vriendelijke blik van de vrouw, de subtiele details van haar kleding, en de levendige penseelvoering worden nauwkeurig gereproduceerd om de originele charme van dit portret te behouden. Haal een stukje van de Gouden Eeuw in huis met dit prachtige werk van Judith Leyster.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 71625856555

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.9 ★★★★★
Based on 28 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
J
Verified Purchase
Jonathan Bailey
Grantham, US
★★★★★ 5
Required Reading for Egyptologists
Format: Paperback
To say the very least, this book is an enlightening read. The author attempts to design a new chronology of Egypt based on a number of archaeological observations he made which pointed to certain anomolies in the standard chronology of the Third Intermediate Period of Egyptian history. The TIP is one of those points in history where information is scanty and there is much room for error in interpreting existing archaeological evidence. Rohl posits that the 21st and 22nd pharaonic dynasties were at least partly contemprary in a period of balkanization of Egypt, contrary to the conventional chronology's view that they were successive. He therefore shifts the entire preceding dynastic histories downward from 200 to 300 years. That is, what we previously though to occur at 1250 BC actually happened at 1000 BC according to Rohl. In so doing Rohl has done much to synchronize Egyptian chronology with the chronology of the bible. Rohl claims that the Amarna letters were not to be compared to Joshua's conquest of Canaan, a period where they clearly do not fit, but rather tell the tale of Saul's and David's claiming of Israel from Phillistine Egyptian vassals. He synchonizes Ramesses II's conquests of Asia Minor with the biblical invasion of Shishak. Also, he identifies the Egyptian 'Hyksos' with the Amalekites of the book of Exodus. There are many other enlightening points of connection with the bible that Rohl makes, but my point here is not to explain them all. The true value of this book for any egyptologist, student of biblical history, or any student of the ancient world at all, is this book's popular presentation of the field of archaeology and ancient history. So rare are books that actually connect a lay reader with the methodologies and evidence upon which researchers base their works. In order to show a need for a revision of Egyptian chronology, Rohl shows how the entirety of Egyptian chronology depends on all but of a handful of archaeological finds, many of them of dubious reliability. Even if Rohl's opponents find more pieces of evidence supporting the standard chronology, the number will still be very small and they will quite likely be as subject to interpretation, as are the ones that Rohl has pointed out. Rohl goes to great lengths to show the history of the observations that scholarship has made, thereby showing us where they may have gone wrong. (As a popular book, I must confess that parts of Rohl's historical narratives depict events in which one expects to find Indiana Jones) Next, when building his own chronology, Rohl puts us close to the texts and archaeological evidence upon which he bases his theories. Rohl's conclusions are in many cases impressive, but in some cases I had to shake my head and come to the conclusion that he was grasping at straws. For instance, I believe that his work in astronomical retrocalulations to find the dates of eclipses recorded in ancient texts is pretty shaky. I even doubt that the text that he is talking about is even mentioning an eclipse. This information has proved to be incredibly valuable to me, however, as I now know that astronomy based chronology, something I though would give absolute and undisputable dates, is as foggy an area of research as any. I do not know if I will eventually embrace Rohl's ideas or not, or if partially. I do know that reading this book has shown me the types of reasoning and observations that old world historians make, and can now make an informed decision about how firm our grip on dating events of the past is. My conclusion: if somebody tells you some biblical event did not happen because the dates don't line up with scientific knowledge, don't be disheartened. We have a LONG way to go before we can truly be confident about such statements, if indeed we will ever arrive at that sort of knowledge. This uncertainty that I have gained from Rohl's book is corroberated by the "Oxford History of Ancient Egypt" which provides wonderful information on Egyptian chronology. Everyone who wants to study ancient history, whether it be Egyptian, biblical, Middle Eastern, or even Chinese for that matter, should read this book, so the next time they read somewhere that 'such and such happened at 3200 BC', they will know to take that statement with a grain of salt. Whether Rohl is right or not, I am forever indebted to him for showing me how chronologists operate. Lastly, I would like to say, after all this talk about archaeology and methodology of Egyptologists, that this book is very readable and comprehensible to the lay reader. Though a smattering of knowledge of biblical and/or Egyptian history will make the book more interesting to the reader, no such knowledge is required in order to understand the book or find value in it. It is truly a popular book intended for the average interested person. I recommend it to all.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 10, 2001
S
Verified Purchase
Stone Dog
Chelsea, US
★★★★★ 5
Exciting reinterpretation of ancient history.
Format: Paperback
In "Pharoahs And Kings", author David Rohl offers the reader a stunning new interpretation of the events of the ancient world in Egypt and the Levant. In doing so, he ties in Biblical events to their proper place in history. This is a stunning reordering of events and personalities and brings both Egyptian and Biblical history to a much closer synchronization. The book begins in Egypt where Rohl lays out his evidence for condensing the chronology of Egypt. Though we use AD/BC as a method of numbering our years, the ancients did not do so and used regnal dates ("In the third year of Pharoah So-And-So's reign, something happened."). By counting all Pharoahs and their reign lengths, historians felt they had a handle on when, according to our dating system, things happened. When they did so, they discovered the events portrayed in the Bible didn't match. When they date Solomon's reign in Israel to the Iron Age, for example, they find economic development to be poor - a far cry from the Biblical accounts of Solomon's reign as a flowering of culture and rich in trade. Likewise, Jericho's walls did not fall in the time period most historians would place the Exodus and entrance into the Levant of the Hebrews. Therefore, the Biblical accounts are simply myth, nothing more. David Rohl is a historian, not a religious believer and his point of view is as a historian. His focus is to find a more accurate timeline for the events in the ancient Middle East. He begins in Egypt because that is his area of expertise and he gives convincing arguements for re-ordering the events of Egypt. The clincher, for me, was the tombs of Tanis (among other inconsistencies in the conventional dating such as the number of Apis Bulls) in which the tomb of Psusennes I cuts into the tomb of King Oskoron II and was obviously built after the tomb of Oskoron II. The problem? Oskoron II was from the 22nd dynasty while Psusennes was from the 21st! It is quite obviously reversed! Rohl's conclusion is that two dynasties were contemporary and that about 140 years needs to be removed from the timeline of Egypt. When this is done, events in the Levant match the events in the Old Testament very closely. In the New Chronology, Jericho falls just when the Hebrews are entering Canaan according to the Bible. Solomon's Israel is now placed in the Late Bronze Age where there is evidence of prosperous cities and flourishing trade. There is evidence of mentions of both Saul and David in the Amarna Letters. This was a page turner and Rohl's work, although controversial, is backed up by fact and evidence. There is less evidence for some of his conclusions than others (in my mind), but it is well researched and never strays from a scholarly interpretation of the evidence written and on the ground. I actually enjoyed this book! David Rohl writes in a very engaging fashion, often using humor. His writing skill keeps subjects that may seem dull very frsh and exciting. He often uses humor and engages the reader, challenges the reader and forces the reader to think. This is not the usual dry tome on archeology that puts you to sleep! He assists the reader with many and high quality photos and drawings of the evidence and includes "side bars" with definitions and explanations in the margins to help the layman navigate the technical aspects of history and archeology without getting bogged down and overwhelmed. This is a fine book and more than deserving of five stars. It's a very eye-opening and interesting read that doesn't seem like a college textbook. Instead, he challenges the reader while entertaining at the same time. I recommend this book with five stars!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 29, 2012
A
Verified Purchase
Amazon Customer
Bozeman, US
★★★★★ 5
Great book. Not an easy read but worth going ...
Format: Hardcover
Wish I had known about this book when it was published! Great book. Not an easy read but worth going thru more than once with great info. I have long held the belief of the early exodus date due to the Great Pyramid dating. Have read in many books about the confusion of the Egyptian chronology but this is the first one I've seen that really opens it up for examination.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 13, 2016
P
Verified Purchase
PhiloX
Battle Creek, US
★★★★★ 4
A Lost Book doesn't Make Up for Lost Time
Format: Paperback
I bought the hard back copy of this book years ago & what an interesting read with great time lines & beautiful color photos. Someone borrowed the book & I forgot who I loaned it to. After years of trying to remember where it went, I at last bought it again as a paper back through Amazon.com. It's a used book with no marks & only a slight indentation on a few pages on the side. Now that I am looking into it & remembering it once again, I am over loaded with too many historical theories. Maybe it's my fault for being a book reader rather than an Egyptologist. I am going to write down some simple time frame theories & you will see what this book is about: General View: The Hebrews came into Egypt through reuniting Joseph & his brothers. They experienced the Amarna period of primitive Monotheism. Akhenaton was over thrown & polytheism was reinstated as the Hebrews were enslaved. Moses came during Rameses II & the Exodus was during the last years of Rameses II or the Pharaoh Marneptah. Amarna period of Akhenaton 1352-1337/1334 BC Rameses II 1279-1213 BC Exodus last years of Rameses II or Marneptah. Problems: Biblical History is off by 180 years if counted back from the creation of Solomon's temple. Rameses II was a great conquer, & both he & his son Marneptah never wrote of 10 plagues or an Exodus. Both died as old men & their mummys are still with us. David Rohl's Theory: revised Egyptian history by shortening the 3rd Intermediate Period by almost 300 years. Tutimaios known as Dudimose is the Pharaoh of the Exodus Exodus 1447 BC Amarna period of Akhenaton = time of King David approx. 1000 BC. Proof: letters written between an Egyptian Pharaoh & King of Israel during that period. Rameses II = Shishak of 921 BC sack of Jerusalem. Proof: Rameses II used a monogram that comes close to Shishak. Problems: goes against establish Egyptian time frames or "If the Bible doesn't fit the Egyptian time frames then make the Egyptian time frames fit the Bible". Akhenaton is no longer the 1st political monotheist & seems out of place not influencing Moses & writing letters to King David. From Another Book I Read - "Akhenaton & Moses" by Ahmed Osman Ahmed Osman's Theory: Akhenaton is the same person as Moses Amarna period of Akhenaton 1352-1337/1334 BC Exodus after the overthrow of Akhenaton by Rameses I Problems: Moses doesn't die overlooking the Promise land of Canaan as stated in Deuteronomy 34 but dies without a known grave as did Akhenaton. Moses monotheism doesn't deal with a solar disc as a symbol of the one God or a replacement of a lesser Egyptian God, but is from an inherited convent. Other Dates of the Exodus: Josephus 1552 BC Sedar Olam Rabbah 1440 BC Book of Jubilees 2410 BC Early Church Fathers 1570 to 1320 BC I need to research Immanuel Velikovsky ideas on this subject matter. I just bought the book & will review it.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 23, 2013
A
Verified Purchase
Amazon Customer
Lowell, US
★★★★★ 5
Correcting the Biblical Chronology
Format: Hardcover
When I first begin my study of the Bible, I had purchased another book on archaeology and the first thing I realized is that nothing fit. The time of Solomon was impoverishment in Israel. When you read the Bible Solomon was the richest king ever. David Rohl's book Pharaohs and Kings changed all that. He persuasively shows where the chronology is wrong and when corrected things fall into place. What is commonly called the old testament comes to life. It is the greatest book on Biblical Archaeology ever written. Thank you David !!!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 10, 2019

recommand products