Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 14 - Jul 19
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
b7012t p4s umTechnische Basisdaten Brand FAG Produkttitel B7012 C T P4S UM FAG Teilnummer des Herstellers 0191511950000 InnendurchmesserMM 60 AuendurchmesserMM 95 ueres Breitenma in Milimeter 18 InnendurchmesserInch 2. 3622 AuendurchmesserInch 3. 7402 ueres Breitenma in Zoll 0. 7087 Gewicht in Kilogramm 0. 4 Abdichtung Keine Abdichtung Przision P4S Przision (Higher than P4) Contact Angle 15 degrees Pairing G Universal Pairing Axial Internal Clearance Preload UM
Technische Basisdaten
| Brand | FAG |
| Produkttitel | B7012-C-T-P4S-UM FAG |
| Teilnummer des Herstellers | 0191511950000 |
| InnendurchmesserMM | 60 |
| AußendurchmesserMM | 95 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaß in Milimeter | 18 |
| InnendurchmesserInch | 2.3622 |
| AußendurchmesserInch | 3.7402 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaß in Zoll | 0.7087 |
| Gewicht in Kilogramm | 0.4 |
| Abdichtung | Keine Abdichtung |
| Präzision | P4S Präzision (Higher than P4) |
| Contact Angle | 15 degrees |
| Pairing | G - Universal Pairing |
| Axial Internal Clearance / Preload | UM - Universal design for fitting in pairs, bearing pair has medium preload in O and X arrangements |
| Äußeres Breitenmaß in Milimeter | 18 |
| Radial Static Load Rating C0r (N) | 23800 |
| Radial Dynamic Load Rating Cr (N) | 40000 |
| Basic static load rating, radial (C 0r) | "23800.0000" |
| ECLASS number | 23-05-08-03 |
| ECLASS2 number | 23-05-08-03 |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 120 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 4
Ehh.. Not bad but not great…
Package Size Name: XXL, Size: 150 sheet (Pack of 12)
The price point on these paper towels is pretty good, but you are definitely getting what you pay for. The quality is not that great in my opinion. They are very thin and not the most absorbent. So, if you prefer a thicker and more absorbent paper towel, I’d probably suggest another option.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 23, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Wash Your Hands!
Package Size Name: XXL, Size: 150 sheet (Pack of 12)
Great deal for the quality of these paper towels! We order them from Amazon for the office every time! They're the perfect size for use in the bathrooms or the kitchen area, so very versatile. They are very soft paper towels and absorb moisture easily.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 22, 2026
★★★★★ 3
Thin and scratchy
Package Size Name: XXL, Size: 150 sheet (Pack of 12)
Unbelievably thin, brittle and terrible quality. Couldn’t wait to use them up. Like trying to sop up spills with a saltine cracker. Might consider these at half the listed price but for the incremental cost difference, actual quality paper towels are worth it to me. Lesson learned.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 20, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Good Product
Package Size Name: XXL, Size: 150 sheet (Pack of 12)
These would compare to Sparkle brand. Every sheet was very absorbant. I tried these because they were cheaper. I didn't know what to expect. They were just plain white, looked clean while sitting upright just plain. They come with select a size. I thought they were great!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 4, 2026
★★★★★ 4
Thin and cheap
Package Size Name: XXL, Size: 150 sheet (Pack of 12)
Very thin, cheap and just not what I was expecting based on the great reviews and paid a little more too. Meh.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 1, 2026