Pay in installments of $97.56 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 27 - Sep 1
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
btw35 ctn9 sp skfTechnische Basisdaten Abdichtung: Without Auendurchmesser: 62 mm Berhrungswinkel: 60 ueres Breitenma: 34 mm Ermdungsgrenzbelastung: 1. 83 kN Fettbezugsmenge: Gref: 1. 9: cm Gewicht: 350 Gramm Herstellungsland: Italien Schmierkanal: nicht vorhanden Schmierffnung Spannung: 340: N Zolltarifnummer: 8482 1090 Erweiterte technische Daten 34 mm Hhe 50. 8 mm Schulterdurchmesser Wellenscheibe (hohe Schulter) 62 mm Auendurchmesser Anzahl der Reihen 2
Technische Basisdaten
| Abdichtung: Without |
| Außendurchmesser: 62 mm |
| Berührungswinkel: ±60° |
| Äußeres Breitenmaß: 34 mm |
| Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung: 1.83 kN |
| Fettbezugsmenge: Gref: 1.9: cm³ |
| Gewicht: 350 Gramm |
| Herstellungsland: Italien |
| Schmierkanal: nicht vorhanden Schmieröffnung |
| Spannung: 340: N |
| Zolltarifnummer: 8482 1090 |
Erweiterte technische Daten
| 34 mm Höhe |
| 50.8 mm Schulterdurchmesser Wellenscheibe (hohe Schulter) |
| 62 mm Außendurchmesser |
| Anzahl der Reihen 2 |
| Außendurchmesser 62 mm |
| Axiale Tragfähigkeit Double-direction |
| Berührungswinkel 60 ° |
| Beschichtung Without |
| Dynamische Tragzahl 16.8 kN |
| Dynamische Tragzahl: 16.8 kN |
| Einzelgewicht 0.347 kg |
| Erreichbare Drehzahlen für Öl-Luft-Lubrikation: 14 000 r/min |
| Höhe 34 mm |
| Nachschmierfunktion: Keine |
| Schmierstoff None |
| Statische Tragzahl 39 kN |
| Statische Tragzahl: 39 kN |
| Statische axiale Steifigkeit: 455: N/µm |
| UNSPSC-Code 31171531 |
| eClass-Code 23-05-10-02 |
| max.0.3 mm Rundungsradius |
| max.1 mm Rundungsradius |
| min.1 mm Wellenscheibe Kantenradius |
| min.57.3 mm Durchmesser der WelleKeine/ Nicht vorhandenlauffläche |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 8 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
The best!!
These are literally the best dermaplaners I have ever purchased! I feel like I just went to a professional. Don’t waste your time buying anything else other than this because it works the best!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 7, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Excellent quality
Very happy with quality
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 13, 2026
★★★★★ 4
At least they are sterile
These are funny being advertised as dermaplane because they are packaged as scalpels. The 5 scalpels are individually wrapped, and labeled sterile. As the price indicates, they are on the cheap side.
Which is fine, they work, but they aren’t terribly sharp so you have to scrape a bit harder than preferred.
For dermaplaning I prefer the schick ones as they have tiny serrations which cut the hair better than anything else I have found so far.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 2, 2024
★★★★★ 5
Me encantó
Color: #14R - Pack of 21 (20 Blades + 1 Handle)
Excelente
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 13, 2026
★★★★★ 1
Blades are not sharp and will not remove peach fuzz, even after two swipes
Color: #10 - Pack of 21 (20 Blades + 1 Handle)
I was really disappointed in this. It did not remove all of the peach fuzz completely and I dermaplaned twice back to back. Which tells me the blades aren’t as sharp as they’re made out to be. The blade handle was sturdy and seemed to be made of good quality. But the blades themselves are horrible at cutting and aren’t razor sharp. I personally wouldn’t purchase this if I were you. I’ll keep the blade handle, but I will definitely be purchasing different blades.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 14, 2026