SKU: 97740112730

Victron 100A Battery Isolator Argo FET 100-2 | 2 Batteries

Sale price$138.51 Regular price$153.90
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $38.48 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 31 - Sep 5

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Victron 100A Battery Isolator Argo FET 100-2 | 2 BatteriesReliable multi battery charging without cross discharge The Victron Argo FET 100 2 100A Battery Isolator is a high efficiency battery isolator designed to charge 2 battery banks from a single alternator or a single output battery chargerwhile keeping each battery electrically separated. That separation is the key benefit: powering lights, a fridge or a winch from your auxiliary battery bank is far less likely to flatten the starter battery, helping

Reliable multi-battery charging without cross-discharge

The Victron Argo FET 100-2 100A Battery Isolator is a high-efficiency battery isolator designed to charge 2 battery banks from a single alternator or a single-output battery charger—while keeping each battery electrically separated. That separation is the key benefit: powering lights, a fridge or a winch from your auxiliary battery bank is far less likely to flatten the starter battery, helping improve vehicle reliability for touring, marine and off-grid power setups across Australia.

Unlike traditional diode splitters, this unit uses FET isolator technology to minimise voltage drop. In practical terms, more of your alternator’s output reaches your batteries, which can support better charge acceptance and shorter run times in real-world systems. It also avoids the common need to raise alternator voltage to compensate for isolator losses—particularly helpful when you’re integrating modern battery chemistries or managing longer cable runs.

Designed for touring, marine and off-grid electrical systems

This isolator suits common 12V and 24V automotive and marine power systems with 12/24V auto-ranging operation. It’s a strong fit for caravans, 4WD dual-battery installs, work utes, boats, and remote power cabinets where you want straightforward alternator charging distribution without tying battery banks together. Each output is independently isolated, so different battery banks can be charged simultaneously while remaining protected from mutual discharge paths.

Helps alternators start charging when split charging is installed

Some alternators require a sense/return voltage on the B+ output to begin charging. When an isolator is installed, that return path can be reduced—occasionally leading to delayed or no alternator start-up. This unit includes an alternator energise input to assist with alternator excitation in these scenarios, supporting stable charging behaviour when the engine run/stop circuit is engaged. This is particularly relevant in modern vehicles and certain marine alternator configurations.

Installation notes that protect performance

As with any high-current battery isolator, overall charging performance depends heavily on cable sizing, connection quality and cable length. Keeping cable runs short and selecting an appropriate conductor cross-section helps reduce voltage drop in the wiring so the benefits of low-loss FET switching are preserved. For best results, follow Victron wiring guidance and use properly crimped lugs, secure fasteners and sound corrosion protection—especially in coastal and marine environments.

Key features

  • Simultaneous charging of 2 battery banks from one alternator or charger
  • FET technology for very low voltage drop compared with diode splitters
  • Battery bank isolation helps reduce the risk of draining the starter battery from auxiliary loads
  • 12V/24V system compatibility with auto-ranging operation
  • High-current terminals for secure connections in demanding automotive and marine installs
  • Status indication to support quick checks during commissioning and fault-finding

Very low voltage drop (typically around 0.02V at low current, averaging about 0.1V at higher currents) helps maximise charging voltage at the batteries compared with diode isolators.

Alternator energise input can assist alternator start-up in systems where the alternator needs B+ voltage present to begin charging.

Build a more dependable dual-battery or multi-battery system

If you’re planning a dual-battery split-charge setup and want a proven way to distribute alternator charging while keeping battery banks isolated, the Victron Argo FET 100-2 100A Battery Isolator is a practical, low-loss solution. Add it to your setup to support cleaner power management and more confident starts on the road or at sea.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 97740112730

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.0 ★★★★★
Based on 7 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
E
Verified Purchase
erika
New York, US
★★★★★ 4
They are good
They were really good with nice flavor just not sour
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 20, 2023
P
Verified Purchase
paige alexander
Massapequa, US
★★★★★ 5
Tasty
Yummy.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 7, 2026
S
Verified Purchase
slimwriter
Draper, US
★★★★★ 2
Not sour
Not really sour at all so it’s a pretty disappointing candy.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 6, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Moon Riley
Battle Creek, US
★★★★★ 5
Sugar free
Tastes great
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 21, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Mr. Paul A. Ackermann
Houston, US
★★★★★ 5
Dude, it's not just a horror novel
Format: Paperback
This is to the previous reviewer (C. Scanlan). If this is just a horror novel, it failed miserably. It is not exactly a blood ’n gore thriller. Compared to Stephen King, it is pretty tame. What puts the horror in this book is that it is social commentary. Mary Shelly is not just trying to scare us. It is more than just a “Friday the 13th” movie. Mary Shelly is delivering a message. It seems that everyone understands this except this reviewer. There have been several different interpretations of the novel (see [...] for 10 different meanings of the novel). ICE takes the interpretation that Shelly is saying science can go too far. This is a perfectly valid interpretation. One can disagree with this interpretation but let’s not resort to name calling and personal attacks – that those who hold such an interpretation are doing a “low level attempt to cash in on home schooling Christian paranoia and fear of health care” or believe that “AIDS [is] the fruit of sin”. My wife and I are Catholic parents and we sent our children to public schools He mocks the idea of a secular fundamentalist but then demonstrates what that is. A religious fundamentalist sees anyone who disagrees with him as being of the devil. A secular fundamentalist sees anyone who disagrees with him as guilty of “brainwashing” others. In both cases, true dialogue is impossible. Another thing that a fundamentalist does is that he sees things in opposite extremes. If you are warning of the dangers of trusting too much in science then you must be against science. There is no middle ground for the fundamentalist. If you see that science can sometimes go too far then that means you are against health care. But this is a non-sequitur. Nielson writes “Frankenstein’s placing of the creation of life within the scientific method first destroys the unrepeatability and systematically eliminates the other elements [of hope, love, beauty, creativity and sacrifice]”. Nielson is not criticizing the scientific method in total. He is only criticizing it in the creation of life. The reviewer writes “He thereby easily and explicitly condemns the whole process and philosophy of the scientific method”. But Nielson is not condemning the whole process of the scientific method. He is only condemning it in the creation of life. The reviewer then mocks the credentials of the critics in the book - “So who are these essayists superior to Norton's and Oxfords and free of deconstructionist feminist secular fundamentalism, experts so august Ignatius should want them mentioned on their product page yet are nowhere to be seen?” But this game can be played both ways. What are the credentials of this reviewer? Is this reviewer so august as to challenge these essayists? Again, this is merely an ad-hominem attack. I really do not care who has the best credentials. What matters is who makes sense. Sometimes intellectuals can make the dumbest claims. Read Paul Johnson’s book, “Intellectuals” (http://www.amazon.com/Intellectuals-Marx-Tolstoy-Sartre-Chomsky/dp/0061253170/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1421862888&sr=8-1&keywords=intellectuals). He compares the essayists unfavorably to “good solid Roman Catholic moral theology” from the likes of Richard A. McCormick S.J., who “is the renowned leader of Roman Catholic Moral Theology in the field of bioethics in the USA.” He overlooks the fact that A. McCormick S.J. has dissented from teachings of the Popes Paul VI, John Paul II, and Benedict XVI over contraception. The “renowned leader” in the Catholic Church in morality is first and foremost the pope. Since Richard A. McCormick has contradicted the popes, he cannot be a good solid Catholic theologian. Mary Shelly lived right after the Enlightenment – man is the measure of all things. She lived at a time when people believed that science will solve all our problems. This is called scientism. ICE contends that Shelly is saying that we may be expecting too much from science. It does not mean that Shelly was saying that we should reject science. And it does not mean that Shelly believes that we should go back to the Catholic faith. In fact, ICE acknowledges that Shelly was an anti-Catholic. But the Church believes that the kernel of truth can be found in others, even in anti-Catholics. This is part of the Catholic tradition. St Augustine learned from Plato and St Aquinas learned from Aristotle. ICE would take that kernel of truth and expound that with the fullness of the Catholic faith. You may disagree with the Catholic faith, or with ICE looking at Shelly’s book from a Catholic perspective. But this is at least as a legitimate an interpretation as any other. In fact, this interpretation seems closer to the truth than the others. This interpretation is the traditional interpretation, which means that it goes back further to Shelly’s time than the modern interpretations, and is therefore less likely to be in error. BTW, the reviewer wrote that “Opus Dei right wing publishing (or reprint) house is selling this novel is to milk the home school market and to support its own bizarre bio-ethical ideology”. This is factually wrong. The company that publishes Opus Dei’s books is Sceptre. But the publisher of ICE is Ignatius Press.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 22, 2015

recommand products