Pay in installments of $20.25 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 30 - Aug 4
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
遺忘之屋: Rachel Ip : Laura Hughes : Rachel Ip (The Last Garden) Laura Hughes 2018(Theres A Pig Up My Nose!) 0~6
作者: 火月桂（Rachel Ip）| 繪者: 蘿拉．休斯（Laura Hughes）| 譯者: 葉嘉青
我們都難免「健忘」。小孩子健忘，他們只專注於當下。大人健忘，不是忘記鑰匙就是找不到眼鏡。比「健忘」更深層的問題，則是記憶喪失或失智。全球許許多多家庭，都必須面對年長的親人漸漸失智的狀況。《遺忘之屋》這個故事，可以成為一個小小的橋梁，讓孩子能從孩童的視角理解這個重要議題，並且溫柔同理。
【故事介紹】
艾蜜莉的奶奶很健忘。她有時會忘記一些小事，像是自己把眼鏡放到了哪裡；或是忘記重要的大事，比如特別的回憶和人。艾蜜莉也有點健忘，因為她總是忙著作白日夢和到處探險。一天，兩人外出散步時，在森林深處發現了「遺忘之屋」。原來，人們忘記的一切事物，都被儲存在遺忘之屋中！艾蜜莉和奶奶在那裡重溫大大小小的珍貴回憶，玩得不亦樂乎。回家前，記憶保管人交給艾蜜莉一個神祕信封，裡面寫著如何製造，並儲存美好記憶的祕訣……。
本書特色
◆如果有一個記憶倉庫，當我們找到它、進入探索時，會有什麼大發現？
繪者用溫暖的配色，搭配柔和的水彩筆觸，帶領讀者跟著奶奶和艾蜜莉一同穿越樹林，來到魔幻又充滿蓬勃生機的遺忘之屋。遺忘之屋隱藏在森林深處，打開一扇小小的門，就能進入廣闊繽紛的失物世界：記憶片段化身為蝴蝶四處翩翩飛舞、記憶保管人搭乘熱氣球在樓層間愜意移動、小鳥紛飛，負責運送被遺忘的物品，連絕種的渡渡鳥也在這裡！樹屋中陳列著形形色色的門，每扇門後都是一間獨一無二的遺忘小屋。奶奶的屋子像是一座巨大溫室，裡面放滿層層疊疊的櫃子和抽屜；而艾蜜莉年紀小，所以她的遺忘小屋靠近樹梢，像是大樹新長出的嫩芽般精巧可愛。
【故事介紹】
艾蜜莉的奶奶很健忘。她有時會忘記一些小事，像是自己把眼鏡放到了哪裡；或是忘記重要的大事，比如特別的回憶和人。艾蜜莉也有點健忘，因為她總是忙著作白日夢和到處探險。一天，兩人外出散步時，在森林深處發現了「遺忘之屋」。原來，人們忘記的一切事物，都被儲存在遺忘之屋中！艾蜜莉和奶奶在那裡重溫大大小小的珍貴回憶，玩得不亦樂乎。回家前，記憶保管人交給艾蜜莉一個神祕信封，裡面寫著如何製造，並儲存美好記憶的祕訣……。
本書特色
◆如果有一個記憶倉庫，當我們找到它、進入探索時，會有什麼大發現？
繪者用溫暖的配色，搭配柔和的水彩筆觸，帶領讀者跟著奶奶和艾蜜莉一同穿越樹林，來到魔幻又充滿蓬勃生機的遺忘之屋。遺忘之屋隱藏在森林深處，打開一扇小小的門，就能進入廣闊繽紛的失物世界：記憶片段化身為蝴蝶四處翩翩飛舞、記憶保管人搭乘熱氣球在樓層間愜意移動、小鳥紛飛，負責運送被遺忘的物品，連絕種的渡渡鳥也在這裡！樹屋中陳列著形形色色的門，每扇門後都是一間獨一無二的遺忘小屋。奶奶的屋子像是一座巨大溫室，裡面放滿層層疊疊的櫃子和抽屜；而艾蜜莉年紀小，所以她的遺忘小屋靠近樹梢，像是大樹新長出的嫩芽般精巧可愛。
作者
火月桂（Rachel Ip）
出生於英國，熱愛語言和文學，在英國劍橋大學修習了現代語言和語言學後，在市場傳播領域工作了十多年，並撰寫童書。火月桂曾旅居法國、比利時，近十年來和家人旅居香港。出道作為《最後的花園》(The Last Garden)，《遺忘之屋》是她的第二本創作。
繪者
蘿拉．休斯（Laura Hughes）
屢次獲獎的英國插畫家。她創作了許多圖畫書，包括獲得2018年英國奧斯卡最佳圖書獎的《我的鼻子上有一隻豬》(There’s A Pig Up My Nose!)。休斯的作品充滿活力和人文氣息，她喜歡用水粉顏料、蠟筆繪圖後，再用電腦數位編輯。
譯者
葉嘉青
美國紐約哥倫比亞大學教育碩士，美國加州大學教育研究院進修。現擔任臺灣師範大學講師、臺灣閱讀協會常務理事，並擔任文化部金鼎獎、教育部閱讀起步走、香港豐子愷圖畫書獎等評委。曾擔任兒科護理師、幼兒園評鑑委員。著作及編譯：《繪本小學堂：與0~6歲孩子一起悅讀》、《兒童文學的啟發式教學：運用圖畫書引導提問》、《李歐‧李奧尼啟蒙思考經典套書》等。喜歡藝術及文學，樂於分享優秀繪本給自家的孩子及更多的親子。
火月桂（Rachel Ip）
出生於英國，熱愛語言和文學，在英國劍橋大學修習了現代語言和語言學後，在市場傳播領域工作了十多年，並撰寫童書。火月桂曾旅居法國、比利時，近十年來和家人旅居香港。出道作為《最後的花園》(The Last Garden)，《遺忘之屋》是她的第二本創作。
繪者
蘿拉．休斯（Laura Hughes）
屢次獲獎的英國插畫家。她創作了許多圖畫書，包括獲得2018年英國奧斯卡最佳圖書獎的《我的鼻子上有一隻豬》(There’s A Pig Up My Nose!)。休斯的作品充滿活力和人文氣息，她喜歡用水粉顏料、蠟筆繪圖後，再用電腦數位編輯。
譯者
葉嘉青
美國紐約哥倫比亞大學教育碩士，美國加州大學教育研究院進修。現擔任臺灣師範大學講師、臺灣閱讀協會常務理事，並擔任文化部金鼎獎、教育部閱讀起步走、香港豐子愷圖畫書獎等評委。曾擔任兒科護理師、幼兒園評鑑委員。著作及編譯：《繪本小學堂：與0~6歲孩子一起悅讀》、《兒童文學的啟發式教學：運用圖畫書引導提問》、《李歐‧李奧尼啟蒙思考經典套書》等。喜歡藝術及文學，樂於分享優秀繪本給自家的孩子及更多的親子。
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.7 ★★★★★
Based on 28 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Best Comentary for the layman/bible teacher
Format: Hardcover
The PNTC comentaries never dissapoint, they are the very best comentarys that i have found for those who do not read greek and may have a bit of bible college.. they are technical but not too technical, in depth but not too much. and you can always trust the General Editor DA Carson... i have several other comentary series but this is the best and all of them are rated very highly by the experts..
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 22, 2023
★★★★★ 5
Very thorough Commentary
I would rank this among the best commentaries I have read on 1 and 2 Timothy and Titus. A nice balabnce between academic and pastoral discussions.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 28, 2022
★★★★★ 5
Concise yet thorough treatment of the difficult passages.
Format: Hardcover, Format: Hardcover
Excellent, balanced, thorough treatment of the pastoral epistles. Highly recommended. Note: Customer 7 above is incorrect in stating that Yarbrough doesn’t reference or quote Hubner on 1 Tim 2:12. You will find Hubner on pages 175 and 176.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 28, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Another welcome Pillar commentary
Format: Hardcover
The newest volume in the excellent Pillar New Testament Commentary series is another first-rate effort. The American New Testament professor has already done a very good commentary on 1-3 John (BECNT, 2008). His newest commentary adds to a now rather impressive line-up of Pillar commentaries.
As to the Pastorals, the four most important and substantial commentaries from a basically conservative, evangelical stance over the past few decades have been these:
1992: George Knight (NIGTC – 500 pages)
2000: Jerome Quinn and William Wacker (ECC – 900 pages)
2000: William Mounce (WBC – 640 pages)
2006: Philip Towner (NICNT – 900 pages)
Mention should also be made of two other commentaries. One is the 1999 volume by I. Howard Marshall (with Philip Towner) in the ICC series. It is also 900 pages and looks to be outstanding. But I do not own it (the ICC series is SO expensive), so I cannot comment further on it. Another is the shorter, 300+ page work by Gordon Fee (NIBC, 1984) which can also be added to any list of highly recommended volumes on the Pastorals.
Now we have Yarbrough to join these important works. He provides us with a very workable, informed and detailed examination of the Pastoral Epistles. He spends 95 of his 600 pages on introductory matters. As to authorship, it has become somewhat trendy of late to deny Pauline authorship. Even some conservatives have gone in this direction
Yarbrough offers ten pages on this, and affirms the traditional stance, saying: “For eighteen centuries, Pauline authorship was never doubted by the churches’ intellectual leaders; even in the last two centuries, many have doubted the doubters.”
As to the commentary proper, one tends to first head to well-known, contentious, difficult, or important passages. So let me reflect on a few of these. One of the most hotly debated passages in the Pastorals of course has to do with the matter of women in leadership.
Paul covers this in several places, but the most crucial passage is 1 Timothy 2:11-15. This is certainly a difficult passage in many respects, and one that is hotly debated. The two main camps on this have been the complementarians, who argue that men and women are equal in worth and status, but have differing, hierarchical roles, and the egalitarians, who argue that women can fully serve in church leadership positions.
This debate has been going on for quite some time now. Because all of 1 Tim. 2 must be considered here (dealing as it does with propriety in public worship), Yarbrough has a lengthy general discussion about these issues first. He then devotes another 20 pages to the actual contentious passage. He offers a “qualified complementarian reading” on all this.
Egalitarians may not fully agree, but they should appreciate his careful and gracious exegesis here. And of course he has written on this elsewhere, as in his chapter in the important volume edited by Kostenberger and Schreiner: Women in the Church, 3rd ed. (Crossway, 1995, 2016).
Another issue that can be rather difficult to understand and deal with concerns those who “have suffered shipwreck with regard to the faith. Among them are Hymenaeus and Alexander, whom I have handed over to Satan to be taught not to blaspheme” (1 Tim 1:18-20). Paul says something similar in 1 Cor. 5. Says Yarbrough,
“From these two passages it may be inferred that in grave cases of ethical or doctrinal lapse, and perhaps drawing on Job 2:6, Satan was viewed as ‘God’s agent in judicial administration.’ Whereas congregations would normally have prayed for one another, there were evidently cases where petition would shift from divine protection to divine discipline (with Satan as God’s agent). Sometimes harsh measures are required to wake people up (see 2 Thess. 3:10-14).”
Since discussions about overseers are found in all three epistles, both Paul and Yarbrough spend much time on the topic. In one of the passages he makes this remark: “In sum, ‘the overseer is to be’ introduces more than a random wish list for the pastorally inclined do-gooder. It points to a quality and depth of godliness that are indiscernible for the magnitude and gravity of pastoral labor that Paul models, expects of Timothy, and hopes to see replicated in generations to come at Ephesus and beyond.”
Two more issues that can be contentious for some is found in 1 Tim. 5:23: “Stop drinking only water, and use a little wine because of your stomach and your frequent illnesses.” Some teetotallers try to argue that this is not actual wine, but watered down grape juice. And some of the health and wealth gospellers insist that no faith-filled believer should ever get sick. Yarbrough gives short shrift to both of these ideas.
Another famous passage dealing with wealth is 1 Tim. 6:6-10 which speaks of false teachers and the love of money. Yarbrough affirms the biblical balance Paul seeks to present here:
“Birth and death both illustrate the tenuous relation between life and material goods. Paul wants to relativize (not trivialize or eliminate) the importance of earthly acquisitions, since he observes people tempted to enlist God in their material quest. . . . It is important to note that this is not an adoption of an ideal of Hellenistic philosophy. Nor is it an endorsement of poverty. . . . If God does grant wealth, and if a believer has not sold his or her soul to acquire it, Paul will later give directions for its proper utilization (see on vv. 17-19 below).”
Other matters could be mentioned here. But all up this is a very competent and usable commentary, one that will stand the test of time. It offers careful exegesis and helpful theological insights. It is a very welcome addition to the Pillar series. The PNTC series really has become one of the premier sets for evangelicals and those who want the best of biblical scholarship and careful exegesis.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 11, 2018
★★★★★ 5
Great, New Commentary!
Format: Hardcover
This commentary by Robert Yarbrough will become, I predict, a top-rated volume on the Pastoral Epistles. These epistles are ideal for the style of commentary we find in the Pillar New Testament Commentary (PNTC) series. As respected and valuable as the NICNT volumes by the same publisher are, these Pillar volumes are simply more valuable. They have a better center of focus, are more consistently conservative, and have more value for pastors without sacrificing scholarship. This volume succeeds in reaching that standard too. As you might have guessed, the editorship of D. A. Carson likely keeps this series moored to that lofty perch. BTW, don’t miss the editor’s preface where Carson fawns over Yarbrough’s work here.
I was in love with this commentary within a few pages of its fine Introduction. So many commentators lose their way in the Pastoral Epistles. I have long suspected that it has far more to do with the authors dislike of what these epistles say rather than any actual problem found within them. Yarbrough is not sucked into the irrational fear of using the term “pastoral epistles” as so many are today either. It’s a breath of fresh air.
He opens the Introduction with eight theses on pastoral heritage in these epistles. To my mind, that was a great way to present introductory issues. Next, he does a section each on Father, Son, and Spirit respectively in the Pastoral Epistles (PE). He was particularly perceptive in discussing Paul as a working pastor, even dispensing some silly critical theories along the way. He then tackles in turn geography, people, and key terms. He ends with a section on authorship and other usual introductory matters and masterfully reaches conservative conclusions.
The commentary itself was even better! The phrase “real help” comes to mind. He showed off his skill, for example, in the perpetual battlefield of Titus 2. He gently yet surefootedly takes us where that disliked passage goes. He’s kind to dissenters, careful in scholarship, but not afraid to reach a conclusion. I don’t know about you, but that’s how I like my commentaries. 5 stars all the way!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 11, 2018