Pay in installments of $65.00 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 30 - Aug 4
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
BBK 09-20 Dodge Challenger Hemi 5.7L Shorty Tuned Length Exhaust Headers - 1-3/4in Silver CeramicThese BBK Performance shorty tuned Length exhaust Headers are designed and constructed as direct fit replacements for all 09 23 5. 7L Hemi applications. Each header is manufactured with 1 3 4 in. CNC mandrel bent tubing that offers unrestricted exhaust flow for increased horsepower and torque over factory OEM manifolds. BBK tuned Length headers offer improved scavenging waves for better combustion, which leads to improved performance and fuel economy
These BBK Performance shorty tuned Length exhaust Headers are designed and constructed as direct fit replacements for all 09-23 5.7L Hemi applications. Each header is manufactured with 1-3/4 in. CNC mandrel bent tubing that offers unrestricted exhaust flow for increased horsepower and torque over factory OEM manifolds. BBK tuned Length headers offer improved scavenging waves for better combustion, which leads to improved performance and fuel economy over stock or equal Length headers. As with all BBK Performance exhaust headers they feature a 3/8 in. laser cut exhaust flange for additional strength and a guaranteed leak free fit. All headers are robotically and precision hand welded and then pressure tested to ensure years of reliability and performance in the real world. All BBK exhaust headers are available in a titanium ceramic or polished silver ceramic coated finish and include new exhaust header gaskets, header bolts and hardware to complete the installation.This Part Fits:
| Year | Make | Model | Submodel |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-2020 | Chrysler | 300 | C |
| 2012-2014 | Chrysler | 300 | C Luxury |
| 2015-2017 | Chrysler | 300 | C Platinum |
| 2010,2012-2022 | Chrysler | 300 | S |
| 2009-2023 | Dodge | Challenger | R/T |
| 2012 | Dodge | Challenger | R/T Classic |
| 2015-2016 | Dodge | Challenger | R/T Plus |
| 2016 | Dodge | Challenger | R/T Plus Shaker |
| 2016 | Dodge | Challenger | R/T Shaker |
| 2017-2018 | Dodge | Challenger | T/A |
| 2017-2018 | Dodge | Charger | Daytona |
| 2009-2023 | Dodge | Charger | Pursuit |
| 2009-2023 | Dodge | Charger | R/T |
| 2015-2016 | Dodge | Charger | R/T Road & Track |
| 2009-2013 | Dodge | Charger | SE |
| 2018 | Dodge | Durango | Special Service |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.5 ★★★★★
Based on 6 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Comfortable and stylish
Size: 12, Color: Black
I'm very pleased with these shoes. I rarely write reviews, but these are extremely comfortable and stylish. I bought a black pair and a brown paid. Many times I have to get a wide, but the standard size 12 fits me well. Easy to slip into, yet still snug while walking.
I feel like the price is reasonable too.
Good cushioning, not too thin of a sole.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 7, 2026
★★★★★ 3
Que no tiene pasadores para apretar el zapato
Size: 7 Wide, Color: Black/Black
Que viene en tallas pequeñas y pensé que venían con lazos y no fue así, el resto esta bien el peso muy conveniente
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 30, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Good looking shoe.
Size: 9 Wide, Color: Cognac
It's a good looking should which is true to size. Quality is good. However, it is not leather. Inner and outer covering are man made. For me, it's okay. I ordered a 9W which I knew would be no more than a triple E width. I'm actually a quadruple E width so it's taking a little longer to break in. I won't be using these as often as at this stage of my life, I don't have that have functions that require dressier shoes. I'm happy with this purchase, a good value for the price. The slip in feature works well like my Sketcher slip in.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 27, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Good shoes
Size: 8.5 Wide, Color: Cognac
Great shoes and very comfortable. Not very durable in my opinion. Good for dress or casual.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 27, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Sleek, upscale and supremely comfortable
Size: 9, Color: Cognac
I did not know that Marc Joseph makes hands free slip ins. I own four pair of Skechers, and I thought they were the only game in town. I decided that I wanted a pair of business casual pair of wingtips. I already own two pair of Skechers Mark Nason wingtips in blue and black nubuck, so I bought a pair of their cognac colored. Perfectly fine shoes, but when they arrived, I didn't like the color, so the search was on! I found these cognac-colored Mark Joseph's and hands down, they fit the bill for what I was looking for!
I actually bought two more pair of Skechers in the brown family in the same oxford, elastic lace style: One pair of another style of their Mark Nason line and one pair of their Garza line. So now I am comparing three pair of Skechers to the Marc Joseph's. Obsessive, I know :). Luckily, I have a Skechers store near me for easy returns.
The look I was going for is a sleek, business casual that I could dress up or down. Three things that I love about the Marc Joseph's are the beautiful cognac finish: the white yet lower profile soles and the more formal, narrower toe style.
The MJ's nailed it with the color. They have a slightly darker, more lustrous and glossier look than the others. The color alone looks classier and pairs well with black pants which I wear for work almost every day.
The white soles are exactly what I was looking for. The visible rise is probably about a third of the thickness of the others and are a much more subtle, classier look. They offset the cognac color nicely but are not that in your face, sneaker looking, thick white sole.
When I was comparing them to the others right out of the box, I thought they would be too narrow and tight because they looked sleeker and narrower than the others. But they fit perfectly and were very comfortable right out of the box. Upon closer inspection and comparison, I realized the narrower, sleeker look is because the eyelets for the elastic shoelaces are closer together that give the illusion that the shoe is narrower. They compensate for what might create a tighter fit across the top of your foot with two stretchy "gores" they are called on either side of the upper part. The "slits" are nicely finished, and you can't see the stretchy part and add a nice design touch to the shoe. But between them and the elastic shoelaces, they must stretch just enough to make them extremely comfortable across the top. So, if you have a high instep/arch, they should accommodate it nicely.
Last but not least, they are very comfortable shoes. I wear a size 8 1/2 to 9 and my foot is slightly on the wide side. I bought the size 9's and they fit perfectly. If you are between sizes or have wider feet, you may want to size up a half size. Because the Skechers have much thicker soles, they might be slightly more cushioned, but the MJ's are cushioned more than enough for my purposes and very comfortable. Plus, they actually just feel better on my feet. I can't speak to how durable they will be as I just got them, but so far, so good.
So, there you have it. I rely on other people's reviews a lot when buying online, and especially for shoes. I know it's always a crap shoot, particularly when buying shoes online, so I hope this review helps. Everybody's feet are different, but I highly recommend these.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 15, 2025