![DIXCEL BRAKE PAD TYPE X FRONT 1310769-X [Compatibility List in Desc.]](https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0644/3486/4197/files/main_ph_x_84836562-4905-4e16-b2f3-27a2eb7ace01.jpg?v=1742327085)
Pay in installments of $46.74 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 14 - Aug 19
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
DIXCEL BRAKE PAD TYPE X FRONT 1310769-X [Compatibility List in Desc.]Brand DIXCEL Product Number 1310769 X Compatible Car #REF! Product Description Model Grade:. 2. 0 GTI GTI 16V _x000D_ _x000D_ X type _x000D_ Brake pads with consistent stopping power for heavier vehicles and upgraded oversized wheels _x000D_ Superior braking power to easily stop mini vans and SUVs with upgraded oversized wheels _x000D_ Unlike the past brake pads which focused only on initial bite;.. the new pads offer braking power that is
| Brand | DIXCEL |
| Product Number | 1310769-X |
| Compatible Car | #REF! |
| Product Description | Model Grade:. 2.0 GTI / GTI 16V _x000D_ _x000D_ X type _x000D_ Brake pads with consistent stopping power for heavier vehicles and upgraded oversized wheels _x000D_ Superior braking power to easily stop mini-vans and SUVs with upgraded oversized wheels _x000D_ Unlike the past brake pads which focused only on initial bite;.. the new pads offer braking power that is proportional to brake pedal pressure _x000D_ Firm brake pedal feel and proportional brake performance helps you forget the heavy . weight of the car · Superior braking performance, less harsh to help prolong disc life _x000D_ An must-have item for cars with upgraded oversized wheels that use OEM brake calipers _x000D_ Price for Japanese Cars:. Front :: JPY15,000 ~ (w / o tax) _x000D_ Rear :: JPY14,000 ~ (w / o tax) _x000D_ Rrice for European & American Cars: Front :: JPY22,000 ~ (w / o tax) _x000D_ Rear :: JPY20,000 ~ (w / o tax) _x000D_ Friction Materials: Graphite metallic _x000D_ Effective Temperature Range: 0 ~ 700 °C _x000D_ Max u: 0.68 _x000D_ Ave u: 0.60 _x000D_ Min u: 0.57 _x000D_ Applicable Stages: Street, Off-road Compatible Vehicles : VOLKSWAGEN GOLF iii / VENTO 1HABF 92/4 ~ 95 VOLKSWAGEN GOLF iii / VENTO 1HAAA 93/1 ~ 98/6 Street, Off-road Compatible Vehicles: VOLKSWAGEN GOLF III / VENTO 1HABF 92/4 ~ 95 VOLKSWAGEN GOLF III / VENTO 1HAAA 93/1 ~ 98/6 Street, Off-road Compatible Vehicles: VOLKSWAGEN GOLF III / VENTO 1HABF 92/4 ~ 95 VOLKSWAGEN GOLF III / VENTO 1HAAA 93/1 ~ 98/6 |
| Remarks | LUCAS · chassis No → 1H_SW560000 _x000D_ X type is exclusive for use in Street, off-road and not suitable for on road circuit use. _x000D_ In the case of on road circuit use and causeed early wear etc. We . are totally not responsible Please note this beforehand VOLKSWAGEN GOLF iii / VENTO 1HABF 92/4 ~ 95:. LUCAS · chassis No → 1H_SW560000 VOLKSWAGEN GOLF iii / VENTO 1HAAA 93/1 ~ 98/6: chassis No → 1H_S_399999 (LUCAS) |
| Notes | Images are for illustration purpose only. Actual product may vary. |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.5 ★★★★★
Based on 25 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Soft and cozy
Color: Tie-dye Cream Beige, Size: Twin(60"x80")
Recieved last week. The texture is soft and warm. Love it so far. The beige color is a little more greige than I expected but it still goes well with my decor.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 28, 2026
★★★★★ 5
You won't find a softer throw blanket!!
Color: Tie-dye Khaki, Size: Throw(50"x60")
What a luxurious throw blanket. It is SO SOFT and SO WARM!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 1, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Amazing blanket. Definitely recommend!!😊
Color: Tie-dye Sage, Size: Twin(60"x80")
Best blanket ever. I got it for an Amazon a lightning deal for 55% off! It was only 22 dollars and this is the most comfortable blankets ever. It is very soft and it keeps me very warm. I would definitely recommend it, it's even more beautiful in person. It's very high quality, and it's lightweight but keeps you warm. Though I wish they would lower the price, because it's 70 dollars to buy another one. But still an amazing blanket, 5 stars for me!!! 😊😊🥰🥰😍😍🤗🤗💗💞
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 3, 2025
★★★★★ 4
Fabulous and sooooo soft
Color: Tie-dye Khaki, Size: Throw(50"x60"), Color: Tie-dye Khaki, Size: Throw(50"x60")
This blanket is so extremely soft and cozy. The only reason I deducted a star was because the fur side and the velvety side aren’t sew together anywhere besides the edges/seams, so when I fold it it’s basically like 2 blankets just sewn together and not one blanket. When you lie with it and cover you, they sort of separate if that makes sense but it doesn’t bother us. It’s so comfy to have on the couch and while movie watching. The only time it sort of a pain is when I fold it. In saying that, I would buy again. The velvety side is a soft tan/beige and the fur side is creams, off white and variations of the tan/beiges. So lovely. You can see it next to a solid cream colored blanket I have that I also bought on Amazon. It matches well and I love it!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 20, 2025
★★★★★ 5
This one is really soft
Color: Tie-dye Khaki, Size: Throw(50"x60")
This is actually baby bunny soft! I was very pleasantly surprised. The top side is plush and the bottom side is smooth but in a velvety suede type smooth. It is very well made and after machine washing and drying it several times it still looks and feels new.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 31, 2026