SKU: 33971650456

Lebenspuls Massage

Sale price$22.45 Regular price$24.95
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $6.24 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 31 - Sep 5

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Lebenspuls MassageDIE HAUPTPULSE AM OBERSCHENKEL UND AN DER HALSSCHLAGADER AUSGLEICHEN Das Arbeiten mit zwei symmetrischen Pulsen gleicht die Blutversorgung und den Blutdruck zwischen zwei verschiedenen sten Kanlen aus, die aus der gleichen Quelle kommen. Prinzipiell sollten alle Pulse eines Krpers im Einklang mit Herz und Aorta schlagen, Blockaden und Verengungen knnen aber auf einer Seite des Krpers auftauchen, nicht aber auf der anderen, und vermindern oder

DIE HAUPTPULSE AM OBERSCHENKEL UND AN DER HALSSCHLAGADER AUSGLEICHEN Das Arbeiten mit zwei symmetrischen Pulsen gleicht die Blutversorgung und den Blutdruck zwischen zwei verschiedenen Ästen/Kanälen aus, die aus der gleichen Quelle kommen. Prinzipiell sollten alle Pulse eines Körpers im Einklang mit Herz und Aorta schlagen, Blockaden und Verengungen können aber auf einer Seite des Körpers auftauchen, nicht aber auf der anderen, und vermindern oder verstärken den Druck auf die Gefäße. Wenn man die Pulsschläge in beiden Händen spürt, zeigt es sich manchmal, dass eine Arterie nur bei jedem dritten oder vierten Schlag mit einer anderen übereinstimmt. Diese mangelnde Synchronisation kann leicht ausgeglichen werden, indem man die Technik des Durchspülens abwechselnd mit jeder Hand anwendet. Der Anwender presst und lockert die Pulse und vergleicht, bis sie einander angeglichen sind. Manchmal jedoch sind zwei Pulse derart verschieden, dass sie nicht in einen Rhythmus zu bringen sind. Das kann ein Zeichen für tiefere Blockaden sein, die zusätzlicher Behandlung bedürfen oder eine Untersuchung durch einen Arzt notwendig werden lassen. DEN OBERSCHENKELPULS ÖFFNEN UND AUSGLEICHEN - DAS BLUT IN DEN UNTEREN BAUCH, IN DAS BECKEN UND IN DIE BEINE LEITEN Der Oberschenkelpuls ist eine Hauptschnittstelle zwischen vielen Blutgefäßen, den Lymphgefäßen, Sehnen und Nerven. Wenn man die Technik anwendet, das Blut in den unteren Bauchbereich zu leiten, verstärkt das den Chi- und Blutfluss in das Becken, das Kreuzbein und in die Beine. Die Behandlung verbessert immens die Gesundheit und Funktionen der Reproduktionsorgane, des Ausscheidungssystems, der Beine und Füße. 1. Beginnen Sie mit dem Entgiften und Entsorgen von Verstopfungen im unteren Bauch und im Bereich von Dünn- und Dickdarm, so wie im Kapitel 5 über Chi Nei Tsang gezeigt. (Abb. 6.8.A.) 2. Legen Sie die Hände auf die Oberschenkelpulse in der Falte zwischen Becken und Oberschenkel und vergleichen diese. Wenn ein Puls schwächer als der andere ist, benutzen Sie die Technik des Durchspülens, um sie auszugleichen: Drücken Sie auf die stärkere Seite 9 bis 36 Sekunden, um das Hindernis aufzulösen, das die andere Seite schwächt. 3. Wenn der Bereich einmal geklärt ist, sitzen oder stehen Sie auf einer Seite des Probanden und drücken mit den Kanten beider Hände in die linke und rechte äußere Hüftarterie. (Abb. 6.8.B.) Drücken Sie beide Arterien simultan für 9 bis 36 Sekunden. Das drückt das Blut zurück ins Becken und den Leistenbereich. Wiederholen Sie dies 2 bis 3 Mal. 4. Wenn Sie das Blut in das linke Bein leiten möchten, nehmen Sie den Druck aus der linken Hand. Um Blut in das rechte Bein zu bringen, lassen Sie etwas mehr an der rechten Hand los. 5. Um den Oberschenkelpuls mit dem Nabelpuls auszugleichen, bewegen Sie die rechte Hand hinauf in Richtung Nabelpuls und bleiben mit der linken Hand auf dem linken Oberschenkelpuls. Halten Sie für 9 bis 36 Schläge, während Sie mit jeder Hand abwechselnd Blut zwischen zwei Pulspunkten leiten und spülen, bis diese im gleichen Rhythmus schlagen. Wiederholen Sie dies auf der rechten Seite. DEN HALSSCHLAGADERPULS ÖFFNEN UND AUSGLEICHEN Warnung: Da die Halsschlagadern das Gehirn befeuchten, halten Sie sie nicht länger als 3 Pulsschläge auf einmal. 1. Beginnen Sie damit, Ihre Finger jeder Hand auf die rechte und linke Halsschlagader zu legen. (Abb. 6.10.) Halten Sie sehr sanft, setzen leichten Druck ein, um die Pulse zu spüren, dann zählen Sie bis zu 3 Pulsschlägen und prüfen, ob sie synchron sind. 2. Falls eine Seite schwächer ist, sollten Sie auf der schwachen Seite leicht loslassen und ein bisschen mehr Druck auf der starken Seite ausüben. Halten Sie für drei Pulsschläge. Kehren Sie mit beiden Händen zu gleichem Druck zurück und synchronisieren Sie die Pulse. 3. Falls die Pulse sich nicht von selbst ausgeglichen haben, wiederholen Sie den Vorgang einige Male. Achtung: Wenn die Pulse sich nicht ausgleichen oder Blockaden sich nicht sofort auflösen, dann sollte die Person von einem Arzt untersucht werden. 4. Um den Halschlagaderpuls mit dem Nabelpuls auszugleichen, bewegen Sie die rechte Hand hinunter Richtung Nabelpuls und halten dabei die linken Finger auf dem linken Halschlagaderpuls. (Abb. 6.11.) Halten Sie 3 Schläge lang, während Sie mit jeder Hand abwechselnd drücken und loslassen, um so das Blut zwischen zwei Pulspunkten zu leiten und zu durchfluten, bis die Pulse im gleichen Rhythmus schlagen. Wiederholen Sie den Ablauf auf der rechten Seite.

EAN: 9783954472321
Farbverschnitt: Generell werden die Bücher ohne Farbverschnitt geliefert, auch wenn die Abbildungen einen Farbverschnitt zeigen.
Erscheinungsjahr: 14.07.2017
Autoren: Chia, Mantak
Seitenzahl/Blattzahl: 320
Abbildungen: Fotos von Handhaltungen und anatomische Tafeln
Themenüberschrift: HEALTH & FITNESS / Alternative Therapies
Keyword: Blutkreislauf; Chi; Energiefluss; Entgiftung; Geilmethode; Gesundheit; Heilung; Herzkreislauffunktion; Lebenspuls; Massage; Taoistische Praxis; Übungen
Fachschema: Akupunkt-Massage~Massage / Akupunkt-Massage~Medizin / Ratgeber (allgemein)~Tao - Taoismus~Heilen - Heiler - Heilung
Fachkategorie: Medizin und Gesundheit: Ratgeber, Sachbuch~Massage~Komplementäre Therapien, Heilverfahren und Gesundheit
Interesse Alter: Bezug zu taoistischen Personen und Gruppen
Länge: 213 mm
Breite: 139 mm
Höhe: 22 mm
Gewicht: 685 gr
Produktform: Kartoniert
Genre: Geisteswissenschaften/Kunst/Musik
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 33971650456

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 9 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
K
Verified Purchase
K. K.
Pawtucket, US
★★★★★ 5
Classic holder keeps paper towels in place in a breeze.
Color: 06-bronze
This classic paper towel holder works perfectly. I had constantly unrolling paper towels in the breeze. This holder keeps everything in place now. So nice. Plus, it has a sleek, uncluttered design. I’m very pleased.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 18, 2026
T
Verified Purchase
Terry Anne
Pawtucket, US
★★★★★ 3
Only holds towels in place when it is full or 1/2 full
Color: 01-silver
If you are buying this for the feature of holding the paper towels in place so you can just rip one, I think you will be disappointed. Once the roll becomes smaller (and I tried changing the arm) the arm does not touch the towels. I do like the firm grip on the counter. My other dissatisfaction is the base gets water spots. Being near the sink this happens frequently. It does its job and is attractive.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 21, 2026
J
Verified Purchase
Jay
Lowell, US
★★★★★ 5
Stylish
Color: 01-silver
Good sturdy stand for paper towels. Has small suction cups on bottom for stability. Good finish and good fit under the counter. Heavy base and not flimsy feeling. Brushed aluminum matched other appliances well.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 6, 2026
T
Verified Purchase
The product comes in multiple colors, but the function is terrible
Belleville, US
★★★★★ 5
Goodbye for the value
Color: 02-black
Great value looks wonderful very adorable
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 31, 2026
J
Verified Purchase
J. Thomas Campbell
Draper, US
★★★★★ 5
David Rohl: A "Maverick" in Search of History
Format: Paperback
Recently I wrote a review of Peter Enns' book "The Evolution of Adam" in which I made a brief reference to David Rohl's "From Eden to Exile: The 5000 Year History of the People of the Bible." Several friends who read the review emailed me, curious about Rohl's book and encouraging me to follow up on Enns' book with a somewhat detailed review of From Eden to Exile. Hence...this review. From Eden to Exile is Rohl's own "follow-up" to his previous book "Pharaohs and Kings: A Biblical Quest." It's important here that I inform the reader of the following: (1) Pharaohs and Kings (in my view) is a far more compelling book than From Eden to Exile; and (2) I would strongly recommend that readers unfamiliar with Rohl read Pharaohs and Kings, prior to reading From Eden to Exile. With these thoughts in mind (and before commenting on Eden to Exile), I believe it will prove worthwhile to focus briefly on Rohl's Pharaohs and Kings prior to moving on to his second book - the two being closely related in terms of subject matter. First, it needs to be stated here at the outset that Rohl (unfortunately) has not received much in the way of either praise and/or encouragment from his fellow Egyptologists, most of whom see him as a sort of "reckless intruder" into the discipline, presenting arguments for a revised chronology (what Rohl refers to as "the New Chronology") that his critics appear to regard as little more than fanciful speculation. This is most unfortunate. Rohl's views are fully deserving of critical assessment; however, the casual (sometimes contemptuous) manner with which his views have been almost entirely dismissed hardly constitutes the "finest hour" in the discipline of ancient Egyptian studies - and this would include the oftentimes quite dismissive attitude of Kenneth A. Kitchen, an Egyptologist and conservative Christian who has written his own book on the subject:"On the Reliability of the Old Testament," Eerdmans, 2003. I clearly am no scholar on the history of ancient Egypt. On the other hand, I have been reading on the subject extensively now for more than 40 years - and this out of sheer love for the subject as opposed to academic profession. And one thing I have learned throughout this reading process is that ancient Egyptian chronology is - for a certainty - in some degree of chaos. (It's not all that difficult to locate comments to this effect from Egyptologists themselves). The standard reference guide for the chronology of ancient Egypt is based foundationally on a chronological history of the ancient pharaohs that dates all the way back to the writings of an Egyptian priest named Manetho, whose written account dates to the third century BC - not exactly what we normally consider "the latest available evidence." Furthermore, Manetho's account itself has not survived; what we do know of it is to be found in the writings of Josephus (first century AD), and the early church fathers Julius Africanus (third century AD) and Eusebius (fourth century AD). Indeed, Egyptian scholar (and conservative Christian) James K. Hoffmeier acknowledges as much in his recent book "Ancient Israel in Sinai" (Oxford, 2005) when he writes regarding Manetho's account: "It is widely acknowledged that names are garbled and that some of the dynasties are not sequential but contemporaneous, and that there are clearly legendary stories preserved... Nevertheless," he continues, "Manetho is taken seriously in historical studies." Indeed he is! Egyptologists have precious little more to go on from the ancient world other than Manetho's account. And yet it is somewhat astonishing to discover the extent to which Manetho's account has been (for the most part) dogmatized into a rigid system that appears to be unyielding. And it is against this rigid wall of Egyptological dogmatism that Rohl must butt his head. (Little wonder that he is not fondly regarded within the discipline). That being said, I would strongly caution all readers (and especially readers of the Old Testament, where a good deal of its chronology is tied directly to Manetho's modernized system) to regard this correlation - between OT chronology and Egyptian chronology - with some degree of appropriate caution. In fact, the very controversy over the date of the Exodus (13th century or 15th century) is related directly to the unbridled confusion surrounding ancient Egyptian chronology. As regards From Eden to Exile I would state the following: (1) Rohl's treatment of early Genesis (Adam to Abraham) is highly speculative and he appears to be connecting dots that were never intended to be contiguous; (2) his book takes on greater promise when he reaches the area of his own particular expertise: Joseph in Egypt. Rohl places Joseph firmly within the 12th dynasty, during the reign of pharaohs Senuseret III and Amenemhat III - and his arguments here (despite the standard protest from his fellow scholars) are highly compelling and fully deserving of something other than "we standard Egyptologists always know best!" (Quite frankly, I've reached the point where I believe a more positive - and more accurate! - understanding of ancient Egyptian chronology will have to await the work of younger scholars (and Rohl has plenty of them!) who are more willing to think outside the box by considering other possibilities. As so often happens, we must simply wait for the 'old guard' to retire so that younger scholars - with fresh ideas and a willingness to engage new evidence - can take their place.) And, finally (3); although much of From Eden to Exile is written in a style reminiscent of historical novels, this should not (in and of itself) cause the reader to think that all we have here is manufactured storyline. On the contrary (certainly beginning with Joseph), Rohl weaves his factual history into the unfolding story in such a way as to make the history not only real but filled with life and event. Furthermore, Rohl fully acknowledges in his Introduction that he will be telling a narrative story as he seeks to "fill in the gaps" where hard evidence from ancient historical sources is plain and simply unavailable. And because Rohl distances himself from any particular religious affiliation it means that both evangelicals and fundamentalists should be able to read his account to great profit, without becoming unduly disturbed by some of his conclusions (e.g., the first five chapters). Indeed, his astonishing defense of the historical integrity of the biblical account displays enormous objectivity, far surpassing (in many ways) various books on the subject that have been produced by Christian publishers throughout the past 25 years. I would like to conclude my comments here by strongly urging all evangelical OT scholars to thoroughly familiarize themselves with Rohl's writings - Pharaohs and Kings in particular. Despite his critics this book is entirely deserving of serious reflection. His defense of a 15th century date for the Exodus is (in my view...and the view of many others) highly compelling and by no means easy to dismiss. (I fully understand that most evangelical scholars opt for the later date of 1250 BC during the reign of Rameses II). One continues to wonder, however, why the reference to Rameses in Genesis 47:11 is so easily regarded as an anachronism while Exodus 1:11 somehow places one firmly within the reign of Rameses II. Or why the clear reference to 480 years in 1 Kings 6:1 is so easily dismissed as most likely merely symbolic as opposed to actual - this despite the additional support for a literal understanding of these years that one gets from Joshua 11:26. But then we already know why: standard Egyptian chronology places Rameses II in the mid-thirteenth century BC, all of which "harmonizes" so well with Exodus 1:11. Thus, ipso facto, the Exodus occurred @ 1250 BC. I find myself far more persuaded by Rohl's account of the Hyksos invasion of Egypt (very likely the Asiatic Amalakites of Exodus 17) following upon the Exodus, when Egypt was almost disemboweled and severely weakened by a God named Yahweh, then any other account of the Hyksos invasion I have ever read from any standard Egyptian historian. (By the way: a quick perusal of ten books in my own library on ancient Egypt displays an enormous amount of diversity and subjective opinion, a rather clear indication that (voices to the contrary) there is precious little overall harmony and understanding amongst the scholars themselves when dealing with numerous aspects of ancient Egypt and its pharaohs.) Perhaps all of Rohl's conclusions are entirely bogus. Nonetheless, the massive amount of information he offers the reader for serious consideration needs to be offset by responsible Egyptian historians who can demonstrate (clearly and persuasively) the error of his ways, and do so with strong and powerful evidence that will illustrate the point. (Ad hominen arguments are worthless as a retort.) I have yet to see such a detailed book (with good, solid evidence as opposed to preferred dogmatism) written in response to the growing body of historical evidence that Rohl and his staff of young investigators are busy compiling. This fact alone only raises more unsettling questions regarding the overall integrity of an Egyptian chronology that rests almost entirely and uncritically on a now lost document that dates back to several centuries before Christ. Rohl, via his own admission, is clearly outside the Christian faith...or any other faith. However, in terms of defending the historical integrity of scripture, he may well be the best friend any believer ever had. All the more, therefore, is the pity that OT scholars either have chosen to ignore him entirely...or (the more likely alternative) have never even heard of him. Hopefully...this will change in the very near future.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 21, 2012

recommand products