SKU: 21653463017

NylonPower Glasfaser Filament 1.75mm 500g Schwarz

$58.41 $64.90
Save 10%
No.2 Bestseller on salfueradeti.es >

Pay in installments of $16.23 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 3 - Aug 8

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

NylonPower Glasfaser Filament 1.75mm 500g SchwarzPrimaSelect NylonPower Glass Fibre Hochleistungsfilament fr Ihren 3D Drucker Das PrimaSelect NylonPower Glass Fibre ist das neueste Hochleistungsfilament fr Ihren 3D Drucker. Dieses Material basiert auf Nylon 12 und ist zu 16 % mit Glasfaser verstrkt, was zu einem optimal widerstandsfhigen Filament fhrt. Nylon Glasfilament eignet sich hervorragend fr die additive Fertigung von Komponenten in der Automobilindustrie, im Drohnenbau und fr RC Teile.

PrimaSelect NylonPower Glass Fibre - Hochleistungsfilament für Ihren 3D-Drucker

Das PrimaSelect NylonPower Glass Fibre ist das neueste Hochleistungsfilament für Ihren 3D-Drucker. Dieses Material basiert auf Nylon 12 und ist zu 16 % mit Glasfaser verstärkt, was zu einem optimal widerstandsfähigen Filament führt. Nylon-Glasfilament eignet sich hervorragend für die additive Fertigung von Komponenten in der Automobilindustrie, im Drohnenbau und für RC-Teile.

Haupteigenschaften des NylonPower glasfaserverstärkten PA12

  • Hohe chemische und thermische Beständigkeit
  • Exzellente Oberflächenqualität
  • Minimierte Verzugstendenz im Vergleich zu herkömmlichem Nylon
  • Einfach zu verarbeiten

Starke 3D-Druckteile mit NylonPower und Glasfaser

Das PrimaSelect NylonPower Glass Fibre ist ein äußerst nützliches Material mit einzigartigen Eigenschaften. In diesem Filament wird Nylon mit kleinen, geschnittenen Glasfasersträngen verstärkt, was unglaubliche Steifigkeit, Struktur und hervorragende Schichthaftung bietet.

Einfaches Verarbeiten des NylonPower-Filaments

Das NylonPower-Filament hat eine matte Oberfläche und ermöglicht perfekte 3D-Drucke, die sehr steif und ideal für Objekte mit einem hohen Steifigkeits-Gewichts-Verhältnis sind. Verwenden Sie ein beheiztes Druckbett, das auf 60 °C eingestellt ist, um eine gute Haftung der ersten Schicht auf der Bauplattform zu gewährleisten.

Verarbeitung von NylonPower Glass Fibre mit einer Stahl-Düse

Aufgrund der stark abrasiven Eigenschaften von PrimaSelect NylonPower empfehlen wir die Verwendung einer gehärteten Stahldüse. Eine normale Messingdüse kann ebenfalls verwendet werden, wird jedoch schnell abgenutzt. NylonPower haftet gut auf Glas, das mit Sprühkleber oder Kleber behandelt wurde.

Materialeigenschaften des Nylon Glass Fibre Filaments

  • Gewicht und Spule: Jede Spule enthält 500 Gramm hochwertiges Filament, verpackt auf einer klaren Spule mit starkem Trockenmittel zur Vermeidung von Feuchtigkeit.
  • Perfekte Durchmessertoleranz: NylonPower-Filament wird während des gesamten Fertigungsprozesses kontrolliert, um eine Durchmessertoleranz von +/-0,05 mm zu gewährleisten.
  • Perfekte Spulqualität: Wir haben große Anstrengungen unternommen, um sicherzustellen, dass jede Spule perfekt ist, sodass das Filament nicht auf der Spule verheddert.
  • Einfach zu 3D drucken: Die mit Nylon gemischten Glasfasern machen dieses Material sehr einfach zu verarbeiten auf den meisten 3D-Druckern. Wir empfehlen eine gehärtete Düse.

Tipps zur Verarbeitung von PrimaSelect NylonPower mit Glasfasern

Hier finden Sie nützliche Tipps zur Verarbeitung von PrimaSelect NylonPower mit Glasfasern auf Ihrem 3D-Drucker.

Filament vor Feuchtigkeit schützen

Die in PrimaSelect NylonPower enthaltenen Glasfasern reduzieren die Menge an Wasser, die absorbiert werden kann. Dennoch sollten Sie darauf achten, das Filament vor Feuchtigkeit zu schützen. Lagern Sie PrimaCreator NylonPower nach dem Auspacken an einem trockenen Ort. Das Filament wird in einem vakuumversiegelten Beutel mit Trockenmittel geliefert, um sofortige Druckergebnisse zu gewährleisten.

Optimale Verarbeitungstemperatur von PrimaSelect NylonPower

Für die optimale Extrusion benötigt PrimaSelect NylonPower eine Extrudertemperatur von 250 - 265 °C. Dieses Filament kann auf den meisten 3D-Druckern verarbeitet werden, jedoch empfehlen wir die Verwendung eines Vollmetall-Extruders für höhere Temperaturen. Bei niedrigeren Temperaturen kann das Filament ebenfalls verarbeitet werden, jedoch wird die Festigkeit der fertigen Teile beeinträchtigt.

Verwendung von größeren Düsen

Größere Düsen mit 0,6 oder 0,8 mm erzeugen sehr starke 3D-Drucke und reduzieren das Risiko von Verstopfungen. Es ist jedoch auch möglich, eine 0,4 mm Düse zu verwenden.

Haftung auf verschiedenen Oberflächen

NylonPower haftet nicht gut auf PEI, BuildTak oder ähnlichen Oberflächen. Glas ist die beste Oberfläche in Kombination mit Magigoo, PrintaFix, PVA-basiertem Klebestift oder anderen Klebstoffen. Vermeiden Sie den Einsatz von Lüftern beim 3D-Drucken mit NylonPower.

Erwerben Sie PrimaSelect NylonPower Glass Fibre

Investieren Sie in das PrimaSelect NylonPower Glass Fibre und profitieren Sie von der neuesten Generation hochleistungsfähiger Filamente für Ihren 3D-Drucker.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 21653463017

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.0 ★★★★★
Based on 15 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
K
Verified Purchase
Kindle Customer
Bozeman, US
★★★★★ 5
Does the job.
Works as a paper towel holder. Its a stick. It doesnt look like a cheap stick and it didn't break. Which means it met all my criteria. Great job.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 3, 2026
L
Verified Purchase
Lisa S.
Fort Morgan, US
★★★★★ 5
Nice product
Color: Gold-aa
when having guests over, it's nice for each one to use their own towel instead of having a 'community' guest towel, or those fancy ones that people feel guilty using. This solved the problem.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 7, 2026
A
Verified Purchase
Anonymous B
Chelsea, US
★★★★★ 5
Rich
Format: Paperback
A wonderful book that illuminates the reality of the God of Israel compared to the ANE deities.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 28, 2026
F
Verified Purchase
F. Gwin
Whiting, US
★★★★★ 5
Excellent. An invaluable resource!
Format: Paperback
Recently I have been reading a lot of books that have told me that the Bible's story of Adam and Eve plus the Exodus etc. are all myths that are extremely similar. Therefore, we should rethink the Bible and change our understanding of it to a more modern worldview that incorporates this knowledge and denies any sort of originality in the biblical account. John Oswalt thinks differently. He thinks that the Genesis story of origins is not some random piece of Semitic or Mesopotamian literature, but that is really unique revelation from God (and is prepared to back that statement up!). The book is divided into two sections: The Bible and Myth The Bible and History Oswalt spends the first few chapters defining the world of the Old Testament and trying to find a definition for the word myth. He comes to the conclusion that a myth "the reflection of a certain way of thinking about the world. To be sure, because of the way in which it thinks, the fantastic is often found in myth. But it is not the presence of the fantastic that makes a piece of literature myth; rather, it is the presence of the mythic worldview." This worldview, he asserts, is based off of what he calls "continuity," which he describes as "when the human, natural, and divine realms are expressed and actualized [together]." The worldview that assumes continuity is based on the here and now, and is very panentheistic. Primordial time is a key factor and the gods are dependent on the humans. This is not so with the biblical worldview. The worldview of the Bible assumes transcendence - an independent God meeting with people on his own terms. He then compares and contrasts these views and shows the real differences between stories like Enimu Elish and Genesis 1. He doesn't deny similarities in the narratives, but he shows the differences in the worldviews. He then moves on to history. Just like the word "myth," Oswalt has to define history, because how civilizations have viewed history in the past has never been the same as Western civilization views history. Then he asks whether or not the Bible is history, and whether or not it matters. He makes several great points here, one of which is that ancient annuals and chronicles never recorded the defeats of kings, yet we find Israel's holy book littered with their failures and mess ups. This is a serious deal when looking at whether or not the Bible is history, because in the ancient way of thinking this surely stands out. He then looks at other questions, like "Are Biblical Faith and Biblical History Inseparable?" and responds to some critics (including Bultmann!). He then looks into the origins of the Israelites' worldview by means of authorship. Is the Bible a late text that was updated from an older, polytheistic one? "No!" says Oswalt. He deals with critiques here as well before moving on to a brilliant conclusion where he sums up the book and gives us a view of how modernism and rationalism are taking us back to the worldview based on continuity. Overall, this was a brilliant book and I wish I had read it sooner!!! It seems like so many authors today are trying to convince us that the Bible has so much in common with the other stories of origin out of an anti-biblical or liberal worldview (like ). However, under close scrutiny these criticisms do not stand up. I thank John for this book, and I will be recommending it to countless others!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 11, 2012
C
Verified Purchase
Cari Ring
Louisville, US
★★★★★ 4
Excellent analysis, decent theorizing
Format: Kindle
While the analysis and argumentation presented in The Bible among the Myths is outstanding, the early chapters of the book suffer from a few problems. First - and this is mainly a complaint given my own preferences - the style of writing in chapters 1-4 differs noticeably from that of the rest of the book. While the introduction and chapters 5-10 reflect a learned, academic style, the first four chapters are written more casually, without quite the same rigor that characterizes most of Oswalt's writing. I am not entirely sure of the reason for this difference, and I wouldn't mention it if it were not for the second issue. These same chapters reflect their writing style in their content, so much so that I nearly gave up on the book after the first three chapters. While I appreciate the author's need to provide background information, definitions, and an overarching theoretical framework, his methodology as laid out in the text is much less rigorous than I would prefer to see. The first few chapters are much less heavily annotated, with fewer scholarly references and a great number of offhanded summaries. He labels his approach to the definition of "myth" as phenomenological, that is, examining the common characteristics of a variety of myths in order to summarize what is essential about them. However, his listings of these common characteristics are vague and poorly related to actual bodies of mythology that survive to the present day. Examples, when cited, are drawn almost exclusively from the Greek and Egyptian traditions. For the understanding of Israelite culture as it relates to its neighbors, this is certainly a fair beginning; for the definition of myth, which is a worldwide phenomenon transcending culture and geography, it seems very far from adequate. As someone who has a thorough knowledge of Christianity and Greco-Roman mythology and at least a nodding acquaintance with Egyptian, Norse/Germanic, and Celtic mythologies, I can at least begin to fill in some of the gaps in Oswalt's analysis. His generalizations, although sweeping, are not particularly problematic, but I am concerned that he embarks upon such a grand theoretical project without doing at least a little more specific analysis of various individual mythologies to demonstrate his points. More problematic in my opinion is that he groups all these various mythologies into a single worldview. Any number of scholars have tried to broaden the interpretations of myths to demonstrate that all cultures revert to the same basic narrative (The Golden Bough being the most famous example, and The Hero with a Thousand Faces being a more recent one); none of them has succeeded particularly well from a scholarly perspective. Despite this early weakness, Oswalt's work undergoes a dramatic improvement starting in chapter 5. His basic point - that the essential view of reality in Israel is demonstrably opposed to the view held by any of its neighbors - can be made without resorting to the sweeping claims of the earlier chapters, and he does an excellent job of presenting and analyzing the evidence for his view. His terminology (of "continuity" and "transcendence"), while not quite adequate to present an overarching definition and theory of what constitutes a myth, is certainly well-suited to his specific analysis. In particular, the analysis of the supposed parallels between the Enuma Elish and Genesis 1 is outstandingly done. After presenting a table with the usual outline of the Enuma Elish against the outline of Genesis 1, he simply proceeds to list the major plot events and how much time it takes to relate each one in the text itself. From this alone, it is readily apparent that the prevailing "outline" has intentionally been generated to encourage comparison to the Genesis account of creation. Such spurious efforts - minimizing the events of over 500 lines of poetry, while selecting 5 which bear questionable similarity to a verse in Genesis - are not honest scholarship, and kudos to Oswalt for pointing this out. I agree with a previous reviewer that it would have been helpful to append the text of the Enuma Elish in parallel with Genesis for readers to compare for themselves would have been a nice touch, but Oswalt's claims are not so elevated that they could not be disproven by direct appeal to the text. One final note. A previous reviewer noted that many of the authors Oswalt discusses wrote between the 60's and 80's, and complained that this made the book seem "dated." I am a graduate student in classics, and can assure those who are concerned that in any field dealing with antiquity, "dated" sources are often some of the most important. Unlike quantum physics, which has less than a century of history, the classic writings of antiquity and the history of those eras has been studied for over two millennia. Meaningful research begins, in fact, with the scholars of Alexandria who worked around 300 BCE; often the work they have done is not duplicated anywhere else. In the field of Ancient Near Eastern studies and Biblical studies in particular, there is likewise a long history of scholarly and interpretive effort. Sources less than a hundred years old are not dated - in the grand scheme of things, they are actually quite recent. It is also worth noting that many of the very recent books, which the reviewer presumably has in mind, are written for a popular audience and would not be considered truly scholarly efforts. Some are written by scholars, but those specific books are unlikely to come up in a serious academic analysis of the subject. The views entertained by those books, however, are very clearly addressed in The Bible among the Myths - largely because the scholarly arguments they were based on are much older than most people assume. Just because Oswalt does not mention names of popular authors does not mean that his argument fails to cover all its bases. All in all, the book is well written and persuasive. The earlier chapters might be found in any popular book on the subject, but the later chapters are more clearly of a scholarly bent, with corresponding vocabulary; readers who are looking for more of a lay approach to the issues may want to look for another author. However, the analysis of parallels between the Old Testament and the surviving Ancient Near Eastern literature is well-presented and balanced, and Oswalt's treatment of other scholars in the field seems to be fair. (I have not read any of their works myself, but Oswalt presents both strengths and weaknesses when considering whether an author's position is sufficiently explanatory and praises some aspects of works he disagrees with. He also is willing to point out when he agrees with some of the author's data, but draws a different conclusion. All of this strikes me as favorable.) The later chapters are thoroughly referenced in endnotes and draw from a variety of sources. Chapters 1-4: 3.5 stars Chapters 5-10: 5 stars Overall: 4.5 stars
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 2, 2014

recommand products

XTR PD-M9200 Pedale - Q-Faktor 55mm
158.68
Off Grid SS Tech Tee - Blackout
84.90
Kassette XG-1270 E1, 12-fach - silber / grau
133.51
Force AXS E1 Schaltwerk - schwarz
162.45
Rennschuh Vento Powerstrap R2 Aeroweave - viol / green
175.00